Ethical Leadership in Transition: A Generational Divide in a Post-Soviet Kazakhstan

There is limited research on understanding the generational differences in leadership perspectives. These differences lead to misunderstandings between leaders and stakeholders within business contexts, especially regarding ethics in leadership. With the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the post-Soviet region is experiencing a transition in socially preferred leadership behaviors. Through inductive methods of analysis, this study in post-Soviet Kazakhstan reveals how an individual’s upbringing and exposure to different ideologies shaped their personal ethical framework, which then informs their leadership behaviors. The findings indicate older leaders in Kazakhstan often exhibit consequentialist ethics through autocratic or transactional leadership behaviors that were favored during the Soviet era. Conversely, younger leaders generally demonstrate a deontological ethical framework embodying democratic or transformational leadership behaviors. Drawing on habitus and social learning theories, the discussion centers on how generational differences in ethical leadership perspectives are reflective of a person’s respective era of upbringing. This study contributes to the understanding of ethical leadership by addressing the cultural and historical influences on generational differences, a perspective often overlooked in Western-centric research. Implications for business leaders, educators, and policymakers are discussed. Future research, including the need for longitudinal studies, cross-cultural comparisons, and investigations into emerging perspectives across multiple contexts, are offered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Eurasian Studies
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665251382947
Primary Topic
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Leadership in Transition: A Generational Divide in a Post-Soviet Kazakhstan

Jason E. Lewis
Journal of Eurasian Studies
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
article

Ethical Leadership in Transition: A Generational Divide in a Post-Soviet Kazakhstan

Jason E. Lewis
article en

Abstract

There is limited research on understanding the generational differences in leadership perspectives. These differences lead to misunderstandings between leaders and stakeholders within business contexts, especially regarding ethics in leadership. With the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the post-Soviet region is experiencing a transition in socially preferred leadership behaviors. Through inductive methods of analysis, this study in post-Soviet Kazakhstan reveals how an individual’s upbringing and exposure to different ideologies shaped their personal ethical framework, which then informs their leadership behaviors. The findings indicate older leaders in Kazakhstan often exhibit consequentialist ethics through autocratic or transactional leadership behaviors that were favored during the Soviet era. Conversely, younger leaders generally demonstrate a deontological ethical framework embodying democratic or transformational leadership behaviors. Drawing on habitus and social learning theories, the discussion centers on how generational differences in ethical leadership perspectives are reflective of a person’s respective era of upbringing. This study contributes to the understanding of ethical leadership by addressing the cultural and historical influences on generational differences, a perspective often overlooked in Western-centric research. Implications for business leaders, educators, and policymakers are discussed. Future research, including the need for longitudinal studies, cross-cultural comparisons, and investigations into emerging perspectives across multiple contexts, are offered.

Journal of Eurasian StudiesVol. 17(1)
Nazarbayev University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.