Limitations and strengths of indicators for evaluating the nitrogen status of forest ecosystems
Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition has increased N availability in many forest ecosystems. In contrast, global changes such as elevated atmospheric CO 2 , longer growing season under warming, and increased precipitation may stimulate plant growth, intensifying biotic demand for N. These diverging trends influence the N status of forests, reflecting the balance between N supply and demand and indicating whether a forest is in a state of N limitation, transition phase, or N saturation. Numerous direct and indirect indicators are used to evaluate forest N status. However, an overview of their effectiveness for N status assessments, which require established threshold values between different phases, is limited. Here, we review N status indicators and their threshold values to evaluate their effectiveness in revealing changes in forest N status. In addition, we assess whether indicators provide insights into forest health conditions such as defoliation, nutritional status, species richness of the forest understory, the prevalence of diseases, and forest growth dynamics. The N status indicators included are categorized as tree-related (N content of foliage, foliage or nutrient ratios particularly N:P, natural 15 N abundance (δ 15 N) of foliage and wood), soil-related (soil C:N, inorganic N concentrations, N transformation rates, δ 15 N of soil, enrichment factor), and ecosystem-related (litterfall N flux, nitrate leaching, and N 2 O emissions). Our synthesis suggests that while most indicators are useful to assess N availability, the majority lack clearly defined thresholds to identify N saturation and N limitation. Similarly, we found that the majority of indicators cannot be used for assessing forest health conditions. As most indicators assess specific components of the forest N cycle, a comprehensive assessment of forest N status requires combining indicators to evaluate changes in multiple N cycling processes. This review guides the selection of indicators for assessing forest N status by evaluating their effectiveness in detecting N saturation or limitation, reflecting forest health conditions, responsiveness to N deposition, and the required research effort.
Authors
- Erik A. Hobbie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1629-6307)
- Yunting Fang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7531-546X)
- Wim DE VRIES (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9974-0612)
- Per Gundersen
- Yihang Duan
- Ronghua Kang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2047-445X)
- Geshere Abdisa Gurmesa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2340-6076)
- Ang Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9365-2926)
- Feifei Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0843-5872)
- Abubakari Said Mgelwa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-6033)
- Zhi Quan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4918-7382)
- Weixing Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-6973)
Institutions
- Binghamton University (US)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- State University of New York (US)
- University of New Hampshire (US)
- University of New Hampshire at Manchester (US)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Institute of Applied Ecology (CN)
- Forest Research (GB)
- International Isotopes (United States) (US)
- The Stables (GB)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Environmental Reviews
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2025-0045
- Primary Topic
- Lichen and fungal ecology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00