Lost in translation?

Efforts to increase the visibility of women in the German language date back to the 1970s. These initiatives have been complemented by more recent attempts to enhance the visibility of non-binary individuals. Consequently, a growing number of language-specific strategies have been proposed to either neutralise the language or to linguistically render individuals of all genders visible. The use of such strategies, rather than the still prevalent masculine generic, is often a highly conscious choice. Therefore, when translating such forms of gender-fair language (GFL), an adequate translation should seek to capture the original intentions expressed in German. However, in the context of machine translation (MT), on which we are increasingly reliant, previous studies have repeatedly identified a male bias. While most prior research has primarily focused on binary forms and often on translations from natural gender to grammatical gender languages, this study aims to close the existing research gap by analysing MT of neutralisation, binary, and non-binary strategies from a grammatical gender language, German, into another grammatical gender language, Italian, as well as a natural gender language, English. Given the growing presence of large language models (LLMs) in everyday life and their translation capabilities, the study further seeks to determine whether differences exist between commercial translation programmes (DeepL, Google Translate, Bing) and LLMs (ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) in translating GFL. The findings indicate that translations into Italian capture the original GFL intentions slightly better than those into English. Further, it was shown that LLMs provide significantly better and more accurate translations of GFL, with ChatGPT performing best for Italian and Copilot for English translations. However, the primary focus of translations remains on neutralisation and binary forms. Even when specifically prompted to produce translations that include non-binary individuals, the models continue to struggle.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistik Online
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13092/xzb2n490
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost in translation?

Sabrina Link
Linguistik Online
Gender Studies in Language
article

Lost in translation?

Sabrina Link
article en

Abstract

Efforts to increase the visibility of women in the German language date back to the 1970s. These initiatives have been complemented by more recent attempts to enhance the visibility of non-binary individuals. Consequently, a growing number of language-specific strategies have been proposed to either neutralise the language or to linguistically render individuals of all genders visible. The use of such strategies, rather than the still prevalent masculine generic, is often a highly conscious choice. Therefore, when translating such forms of gender-fair language (GFL), an adequate translation should seek to capture the original intentions expressed in German. However, in the context of machine translation (MT), on which we are increasingly reliant, previous studies have repeatedly identified a male bias. While most prior research has primarily focused on binary forms and often on translations from natural gender to grammatical gender languages, this study aims to close the existing research gap by analysing MT of neutralisation, binary, and non-binary strategies from a grammatical gender language, German, into another grammatical gender language, Italian, as well as a natural gender language, English. Given the growing presence of large language models (LLMs) in everyday life and their translation capabilities, the study further seeks to determine whether differences exist between commercial translation programmes (DeepL, Google Translate, Bing) and LLMs (ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) in translating GFL. The findings indicate that translations into Italian capture the original GFL intentions slightly better than those into English. Further, it was shown that LLMs provide significantly better and more accurate translations of GFL, with ChatGPT performing best for Italian and Copilot for English translations. However, the primary focus of translations remains on neutralisation and binary forms. Even when specifically prompted to produce translations that include non-binary individuals, the models continue to struggle.

Linguistik OnlineVol. 138(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.