Query complexity of classical and quantum channel discrimination

Abstract Quantum channel discrimination has been studied from an information-theoretic perspective, wherein one is interested in the optimal decay rate of error probabilities as a function of the number of unknown channel accesses. In this paper, we study the query complexity of quantum channel discrimination, wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of channel uses needed to reach a desired error probability. To this end, we show that the query complexity of binary channel discrimination depends logarithmically on the inverse error probability and inversely on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Holevo) channel fidelity. As special cases of these findings, we precisely characterize the query complexity of discriminating two classical channels and two classical–quantum channels. Furthermore, by obtaining an optimal characterization of the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing when the error probability does not exceed a fixed threshold, we provide a more precise characterization of query complexity under a similar error probability threshold constraint. We also provide lower and upper bounds on the query complexity of binary asymmetric channel discrimination and multiple quantum channel discrimination. For the former, the query complexity depends on the geometric Rényi and Petz–Rényi channel divergences, while for the latter, it depends on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Uhlmann) channel fidelity. For multiple channel discrimination, the upper bound scales as the logarithm of the number of channels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quantum Science and Technology
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ae0a79
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Query complexity of classical and quantum channel discrimination

Theshani Nuradha, Mark M. Wilde
Quantum Science and Technology
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Query complexity of classical and quantum channel discrimination

Theshani Nuradha, Mark M. Wilde
article en

Abstract

Abstract Quantum channel discrimination has been studied from an information-theoretic perspective, wherein one is interested in the optimal decay rate of error probabilities as a function of the number of unknown channel accesses. In this paper, we study the query complexity of quantum channel discrimination, wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of channel uses needed to reach a desired error probability. To this end, we show that the query complexity of binary channel discrimination depends logarithmically on the inverse error probability and inversely on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Holevo) channel fidelity. As special cases of these findings, we precisely characterize the query complexity of discriminating two classical channels and two classical–quantum channels. Furthermore, by obtaining an optimal characterization of the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing when the error probability does not exceed a fixed threshold, we provide a more precise characterization of query complexity under a similar error probability threshold constraint. We also provide lower and upper bounds on the query complexity of binary asymmetric channel discrimination and multiple quantum channel discrimination. For the former, the query complexity depends on the geometric Rényi and Petz–Rényi channel divergences, while for the latter, it depends on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Uhlmann) channel fidelity. For multiple channel discrimination, the upper bound scales as the logarithm of the number of channels.

Quantum Science and TechnologyVol. 10(4)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Cornell University (US)
National Science Foundation, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.