Quantifying High‐Frequency Turbulence Energy in the Atmosphere and Its Impact on Near‐Surface Diffusion: Parameterization Scheme and Validation in WRF‐Chem

Abstract Atmospheric turbulence is a key meteorological factor influencing the diffusion of urban near‐surface air pollution. The turbulence energy spectrum characterizes the distribution of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) across different eddy scales, with the total energy affecting the diffusion coefficient and pollutant dispersion. Current methods for calculating TKE are sensitive to the temporal resolution of wind speed data, and the limited sampling frequency of instruments is much lower than the dissipation scale. Thus, the high‐frequency turbulence energy is missed, and the total TKE is underestimated. To address this issue, this study used high (∼10 Hz) and low (∼0.05 Hz) frequency wind observations from the Beijing 325‐m meteorological tower to assess how sampling frequencies impact TKE calculations. The −5/3 law of the turbulence spectrum was applied to estimate the relationship between observed and theoretical total TKE, and a parameterization scheme was completed. Results showed that the underestimation due to sampling frequency limitations ranges from 10% to 37%, with higher proportions during night and winter. Then a correction factor (HTMC) was incorporated into the BouLac PBL scheme in WRF‐Chem. Sensitivity simulations of a heavy haze event in Shenyang were set. The experimental group (EXP) showed lower concentrations of PM 2.5 near the surface and higher in higher altitudes than those in control group (CTR) during night, indicating stronger vertical turbulent transport. The concentrations in EXP better match observations, with simulation bias reduced from 23.77% to 6.18%. This work provides new insights into urban turbulence transport mechanisms and benefits to improvements in air quality forecasting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd043961
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying High‐Frequency Turbulence Energy in the Atmosphere and Its Impact on Near‐Surface Diffusion: Parameterization Scheme and Validation in WRF‐Chem

Hong Liao, Zhenxin Liu, Lei Liu, Wenxi Zhang et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
article

Quantifying High‐Frequency Turbulence Energy in the Atmosphere and Its Impact on Near‐Surface Diffusion: Parameterization Scheme and Validation in WRF‐Chem

Hong Liao, Zhenxin Liu, Lei Liu, Wenxi Zhang, Xiaolan Li, Mao Yuhao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Atmospheric turbulence is a key meteorological factor influencing the diffusion of urban near‐surface air pollution. The turbulence energy spectrum characterizes the distribution of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) across different eddy scales, with the total energy affecting the diffusion coefficient and pollutant dispersion. Current methods for calculating TKE are sensitive to the temporal resolution of wind speed data, and the limited sampling frequency of instruments is much lower than the dissipation scale. Thus, the high‐frequency turbulence energy is missed, and the total TKE is underestimated. To address this issue, this study used high (∼10 Hz) and low (∼0.05 Hz) frequency wind observations from the Beijing 325‐m meteorological tower to assess how sampling frequencies impact TKE calculations. The −5/3 law of the turbulence spectrum was applied to estimate the relationship between observed and theoretical total TKE, and a parameterization scheme was completed. Results showed that the underestimation due to sampling frequency limitations ranges from 10% to 37%, with higher proportions during night and winter. Then a correction factor (HTMC) was incorporated into the BouLac PBL scheme in WRF‐Chem. Sensitivity simulations of a heavy haze event in Shenyang were set. The experimental group (EXP) showed lower concentrations of PM 2.5 near the surface and higher in higher altitudes than those in control group (CTR) during night, indicating stronger vertical turbulent transport. The concentrations in EXP better match observations, with simulation bias reduced from 23.77% to 6.18%. This work provides new insights into urban turbulence transport mechanisms and benefits to improvements in air quality forecasting.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(18)
China Meteorological Administration (CN), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.