Does ‘going green’ promote global value chain integration?

Abstract This study examines the impact of environmentally oriented investments on firms’ integration into global value chains (GVCs). We use firm-level data in 41 countries from the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey dataset and control for selection and endogeneity bias. Our findings reveal that the adoption of environmental protection actions boosts firms’ participation in GVCs. Measures reducing air pollution, followed by waste minimization techniques and energy management tools, yield the highest impact at both margins. Larger firms are more likely to experience a rise in their chances of participating in GVCs compared to their smaller counterparts. At the sectoral level, dirty sectors (such as plastics, construction and chemicals) are less likely to witness the positive impact of environment-friendly measures on GVC integration, given their production techniques that are CO 2 and energy intensive. Finally, at the regional level, the effect of such environmental measures is more pronounced for firms located in European Union countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Development Economics
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x25100193
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does ‘going green’ promote global value chain integration?

Chahir R. Zaki, Mariam Fayek
1 citations
Environment and Development Economics
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
2.23
article

Does ‘going green’ promote global value chain integration?

Chahir R. Zaki, Mariam Fayek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the impact of environmentally oriented investments on firms’ integration into global value chains (GVCs). We use firm-level data in 41 countries from the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey dataset and control for selection and endogeneity bias. Our findings reveal that the adoption of environmental protection actions boosts firms’ participation in GVCs. Measures reducing air pollution, followed by waste minimization techniques and energy management tools, yield the highest impact at both margins. Larger firms are more likely to experience a rise in their chances of participating in GVCs compared to their smaller counterparts. At the sectoral level, dirty sectors (such as plastics, construction and chemicals) are less likely to witness the positive impact of environment-friendly measures on GVC integration, given their production techniques that are CO 2 and energy intensive. Finally, at the regional level, the effect of such environmental measures is more pronounced for firms located in European Union countries.

Environment and Development Economics
Laboratoire d’Économie d’Orléans (FR), Paris School of Economics (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.