Tracking the trajectory- Cervical length dynamics in uncomplicated Dichorionic Diamniotic twin pregnancies: A retrospective cohort study
Objective: To study the patterns of cervical length shortening in Dichorionic Diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancies. Design: Retrospective cohort study Setting: Twins Clinic of a tertiary fetal medicine unit Sample population: 389 women with uncomplicated DCDA twin pregnancies Methods: For each patient, cervical length was measured at four weekly intervals. Changes in the cervical length were classified into: Pattern I: Stable cervical length, Pattern II: Early rapid shortening, Pattern III: Late shortening and Pattern IV: Early shortening with a plateau. Association of each pattern with preterm delivery was assessed. Main outcome measures: 1. To determine the patterns of cervical length shortening in DCDA twins across gestation 2. To see the association of each pattern with the risk of preterm delivery Results: Pattern 1 was observed in 37.5% cases, Pattern II in 11.8%, Pattern III in 32.6% and Pattern IV in 18%. The proportion of patients delivering preterm was highest in Pattern II, followed by Pattern III. Pattern II showed a shorter mean cervical length at both the nuchal scan and at 20–24 weeks, with a greater decline in cervical length over this period, compared with Pattern IV. Conclusion: Distinct patterns of cervical length shortening in uncomplicated dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies are linked to varying risks of preterm birth, thus making serial assessment more predictive than single measurements. Funding: None
Authors
- Anita Kaul (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3398-5275)
- Ishita Agarwal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2612-0302)
- Akshatha Prabhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4432-9875)
- Vishwaraman Mohan
Institutions
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals (IN)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-09-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175865418.85996247/v1
- Primary Topic
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00