Disproportionality at Fair Elections Cannot Exceed 1/sqrt(2): A Note on the Gallagher Index and a New Normalised Measure

The Gallagher index of disproportionality is perhaps the most popular measure of electoral distortion in all of political science. While many assume that the index ranges from 0 (perfect proportionality) to 1 (perfect disproportionality), I prove that in any free and fair election its maximum possible value is bounded above by sqrt((N-1)/(2N)), reaching a maximum of 1/sqrt(2) where the number of parties, N, tends to infinity. This bound arises in the limiting case where all parties receive equal vote shares but only one secures representation. Building on this result, I then propose a new normalised version of the index that rescales disproportionality to lie between 0 and 1 under democratic conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2025-khfwb-v2
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disproportionality at Fair Elections Cannot Exceed 1/sqrt(2): A Note on the Gallagher Index and a New Normalised Measure

Jack Bailey
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Disproportionality at Fair Elections Cannot Exceed 1/sqrt(2): A Note on the Gallagher Index and a New Normalised Measure

Jack Bailey
article en

Abstract

The Gallagher index of disproportionality is perhaps the most popular measure of electoral distortion in all of political science. While many assume that the index ranges from 0 (perfect proportionality) to 1 (perfect disproportionality), I prove that in any free and fair election its maximum possible value is bounded above by sqrt((N-1)/(2N)), reaching a maximum of 1/sqrt(2) where the number of parties, N, tends to infinity. This bound arises in the limiting case where all parties receive equal vote shares but only one secures representation. Building on this result, I then propose a new normalised version of the index that rescales disproportionality to lie between 0 and 1 under democratic conditions.

University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.