Association: one term, five concepts

‘Association’ is certainly one of the most prevalent terms in the study of mind, brain and behavior. It applies to actions, stimuli, neurons, brain areas, ideas, words, etc. However we argue that this term can convey five main meanings, expressing five distinct notions of link, whose coexistence and conflation result in conceptual blurring. This largely underappreciated polysemy problem prevents associative accounts of biological cognitive systems from being properly articulated, understood and criticized. Based on a review traversing psychological, neuronal and behavioral sciences, we delineate and characterize these five categories of usage, to show how such classification improves transparency across fields and casts new light on various debates. The scope is extended to include artificial systems. The review is meant to promote interdisciplinary collaboration and dialogue around the central notion of association.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/57zj4_v3
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association: one term, five concepts

Thomas F. Chartier, Joël Fagot, Arnaud Rey
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

Association: one term, five concepts

Thomas F. Chartier, Joël Fagot, Arnaud Rey
article en

Abstract

‘Association’ is certainly one of the most prevalent terms in the study of mind, brain and behavior. It applies to actions, stimuli, neurons, brain areas, ideas, words, etc. However we argue that this term can convey five main meanings, expressing five distinct notions of link, whose coexistence and conflation result in conceptual blurring. This largely underappreciated polysemy problem prevents associative accounts of biological cognitive systems from being properly articulated, understood and criticized. Based on a review traversing psychological, neuronal and behavioral sciences, we delineate and characterize these five categories of usage, to show how such classification improves transparency across fields and casts new light on various debates. The scope is extended to include artificial systems. The review is meant to promote interdisciplinary collaboration and dialogue around the central notion of association.

Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.