Anaximander’s ‘Apeiron’ from a Cognitive Perspective

This article examines Anaximander’s concept of apeiron – traditionally rendered as ‘the boundless’ or ‘the infinite’ – by tracing its conceptual and semantic roots beyond standard cosmological interpretations. Given the fragmentary and often mediated nature of ancient sources, this study shifts the focus toward the pre-philosophical cognitive structures that inform Anaximander’s use of apeiron. Drawing on insights from cognitive linguistics and semantics, it argues that the two principal senses of apeiros – spatially ‘unbounded’ and epistemically ‘inexperienced’, typically treated as unrelated homonyms, in fact stem from a unified conceptual schema. Specifically, the epistemic sense of ‘inexperienced’ emerges through metaphorical extension from the experiential domain of spatial movement – which also informs the notion of apeiron as ‘unlimited’ – to that of knowledge. By reconstructing the semantic and ontological framework within which apeiron operated, this article uncovers an epistemic dimension that complements its spatial significance, revealing Anaximander’s principle not only as a limitless origin of the cosmos, but also as a reality situated beyond the bounds of human knowledge and experience. This reinterpretation opens new avenues for understanding Anaximander’s cosmology and underscores the role of embodied cognition and conceptual metaphor in the emergence of philosophical thought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognitive Historiography
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.28335
Primary Topic
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anaximander’s ‘Apeiron’ from a Cognitive Perspective

Chiara Ferella
Journal of Cognitive Historiography
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
article

Anaximander’s ‘Apeiron’ from a Cognitive Perspective

Chiara Ferella
article en

Abstract

This article examines Anaximander’s concept of apeiron – traditionally rendered as ‘the boundless’ or ‘the infinite’ – by tracing its conceptual and semantic roots beyond standard cosmological interpretations. Given the fragmentary and often mediated nature of ancient sources, this study shifts the focus toward the pre-philosophical cognitive structures that inform Anaximander’s use of apeiron. Drawing on insights from cognitive linguistics and semantics, it argues that the two principal senses of apeiros – spatially ‘unbounded’ and epistemically ‘inexperienced’, typically treated as unrelated homonyms, in fact stem from a unified conceptual schema. Specifically, the epistemic sense of ‘inexperienced’ emerges through metaphorical extension from the experiential domain of spatial movement – which also informs the notion of apeiron as ‘unlimited’ – to that of knowledge. By reconstructing the semantic and ontological framework within which apeiron operated, this article uncovers an epistemic dimension that complements its spatial significance, revealing Anaximander’s principle not only as a limitless origin of the cosmos, but also as a reality situated beyond the bounds of human knowledge and experience. This reinterpretation opens new avenues for understanding Anaximander’s cosmology and underscores the role of embodied cognition and conceptual metaphor in the emergence of philosophical thought.

Journal of Cognitive HistoriographyVol. 9(2)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.