Experience of the Original Phantom-Based Training in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) training programmed that incorporates a phantombased learning module. Materials and methods: Twenty-four participants (13 practicing sonographers, 6 residents, 5 senior medical students; clinical experience 0–21 years) completed a one-day, 10-hour learning CEUS course. Hands-on practice was performed on a proprietary Russian dual-circuit phantom (patent RU 2611905 C2) that reproduces normal perfusion and three focal lesions—aneurysm, cavernous haemangioma and hyper-vascular metastasis—using standard microbubble contrast agents. Training efficacy was assessed pre- and post-course with a multiple-choice test, a 10-item practical checklist (0–20) and the Team Performance Observation Tool (team index 1–5). Results: All metrics improved significantly: test 5,0 ± 1,0 → 8,0 ± 1,0 (Δ = +3,0; p < 0,001; d = 2,0); checklist 7,0 ± 2,0 → 17 ± 1,0 (Δ = +10,0; p < 0,001; d = 6,3); team index 2,0 ± 1,0 → 4,0 ± 1,0 (Δ = +2,0; p < 0,001; d = 1,0). The pass threshold (≥ 70 % test and ≥ 80 % checklist) was reached by 22/24 (92 %) participants (McNemar χ² = 20.2; p < 0.001). Internal consistency was good (Cronbach’s α = 0.80 for the test, 0.86 for the checklist); inter-rater reliability of the checklist was excellent (ICC = 0.92; 95 % CI 0.86–0.97). The correlation between years of experience and practical score decreased from ρ = 0.45 (p = 0.03) pre-course to ρ = 0.28 (p = 0.18) postcourse; one-way ANOVA revealed no post-course differences across four experience groups (p > 0.10). Overall satisfaction (VAS) was 9.1 ± 0.7, with highest ratings for “phantom practice” (9.5) and “mentor feedback” (9.3). Conclusion: A single-day, 10-hour module based on the first domestic CEUS phantom produces a large gain in theoretical knowledge and practical skills and enables rapid attainment of Level 1 competence specified by EFSUMB/WFUMB guidelines. The Russian-made phantom is less expensive than imported analogues, is exempt from Government Decree No. 616 import restrictions, and can be recommended as a mandatory simulation stage in the certification of ultrasound physicians learning CEUS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of oncology diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2025-8-3-64-77
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experience of the Original Phantom-Based Training in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

Yu. P. Buzulukov, D. Yu. Venidiktova, Natalya Marchenkova, Aleksey V. Borsukov
Journal of oncology diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
article

Experience of the Original Phantom-Based Training in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

Yu. P. Buzulukov, D. Yu. Venidiktova, Natalya Marchenkova, Aleksey V. Borsukov
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) training programmed that incorporates a phantombased learning module. Materials and methods: Twenty-four participants (13 practicing sonographers, 6 residents, 5 senior medical students; clinical experience 0–21 years) completed a one-day, 10-hour learning CEUS course. Hands-on practice was performed on a proprietary Russian dual-circuit phantom (patent RU 2611905 C2) that reproduces normal perfusion and three focal lesions—aneurysm, cavernous haemangioma and hyper-vascular metastasis—using standard microbubble contrast agents. Training efficacy was assessed pre- and post-course with a multiple-choice test, a 10-item practical checklist (0–20) and the Team Performance Observation Tool (team index 1–5). Results: All metrics improved significantly: test 5,0 ± 1,0 → 8,0 ± 1,0 (Δ = +3,0; p < 0,001; d = 2,0); checklist 7,0 ± 2,0 → 17 ± 1,0 (Δ = +10,0; p < 0,001; d = 6,3); team index 2,0 ± 1,0 → 4,0 ± 1,0 (Δ = +2,0; p < 0,001; d = 1,0). The pass threshold (≥ 70 % test and ≥ 80 % checklist) was reached by 22/24 (92 %) participants (McNemar χ² = 20.2; p < 0.001). Internal consistency was good (Cronbach’s α = 0.80 for the test, 0.86 for the checklist); inter-rater reliability of the checklist was excellent (ICC = 0.92; 95 % CI 0.86–0.97). The correlation between years of experience and practical score decreased from ρ = 0.45 (p = 0.03) pre-course to ρ = 0.28 (p = 0.18) postcourse; one-way ANOVA revealed no post-course differences across four experience groups (p > 0.10). Overall satisfaction (VAS) was 9.1 ± 0.7, with highest ratings for “phantom practice” (9.5) and “mentor feedback” (9.3). Conclusion: A single-day, 10-hour module based on the first domestic CEUS phantom produces a large gain in theoretical knowledge and practical skills and enables rapid attainment of Level 1 competence specified by EFSUMB/WFUMB guidelines. The Russian-made phantom is less expensive than imported analogues, is exempt from Government Decree No. 616 import restrictions, and can be recommended as a mandatory simulation stage in the certification of ultrasound physicians learning CEUS.

Journal of oncology diagnostic radiology and radiotherapyVol. 8(3)
Kurchatov Institute (RU), Smolensk State Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.