Floral response of eight forb species to prescribed fire in the southern Great Plains (U.S.A.)

Prescribed fire is commonly used to restore and maintain grasslands, often mediating the balance between grasses, woody species, and forbs. Forbs provide the majority of plant diversity in grasslands, and the responses of forbs to fire are important to understanding and predicting the effects of fire on pollinators and on plant communities. However, much of the past research on prescribed fire effects in grasslands has focused on woody plant species and grasses, not forbs, despite the importance of their flowering dynamics to pollinators. Thus, we need to know more about the mechanisms underlying the responses of forbs to fire, especially in the understudied southern Great Plains. In this study, we asked whether the floral displays of eight native forb species in this region differed between burned and unburned plots, and, if so, whether the differences were due to plant density (plants/m2), plant size (grams dry above-ground biomass), resource allocation to flowers (flowers/gram plant biomass), or a combination of these factors. We found that fire responses were highly species-specific. Prescribed fire increased floral display (flowers/m2) of five of the eight species. Floral display was proportional to plant size and plant density (plants/m2). In some species both size and density were larger in their burned plot; while other species show opposite or no patterns. The species-specific responses of forbs in this study reinforces the need to better understand and manage for increased forb diversity and overall heterogeneity to recreate or restore ecosystems that can support a wider variety of organisms and conserve biodiversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17348/jbrit.v19.i3.1425
Primary Topic
Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Floral response of eight forb species to prescribed fire in the southern Great Plains (U.S.A.)

Norma L. Fowler, Kristen A. Baum, Shalene Jha, Elinor M. Lichtenberg et al.
Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas
Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
article

Floral response of eight forb species to prescribed fire in the southern Great Plains (U.S.A.)

Norma L. Fowler, Kristen A. Baum, Shalene Jha, Elinor M. Lichtenberg, Kyle G. Simpson
article en

Abstract

Prescribed fire is commonly used to restore and maintain grasslands, often mediating the balance between grasses, woody species, and forbs. Forbs provide the majority of plant diversity in grasslands, and the responses of forbs to fire are important to understanding and predicting the effects of fire on pollinators and on plant communities. However, much of the past research on prescribed fire effects in grasslands has focused on woody plant species and grasses, not forbs, despite the importance of their flowering dynamics to pollinators. Thus, we need to know more about the mechanisms underlying the responses of forbs to fire, especially in the understudied southern Great Plains. In this study, we asked whether the floral displays of eight native forb species in this region differed between burned and unburned plots, and, if so, whether the differences were due to plant density (plants/m2), plant size (grams dry above-ground biomass), resource allocation to flowers (flowers/gram plant biomass), or a combination of these factors. We found that fire responses were highly species-specific. Prescribed fire increased floral display (flowers/m2) of five of the eight species. Floral display was proportional to plant size and plant density (plants/m2). In some species both size and density were larger in their burned plot; while other species show opposite or no patterns. The species-specific responses of forbs in this study reinforces the need to better understand and manage for increased forb diversity and overall heterogeneity to recreate or restore ecosystems that can support a wider variety of organisms and conserve biodiversity.

Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of TexasVol. 19(3)
University of North Texas (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), University of Kansas (US), Mitchell Institute (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.