Effects of Surface Stability on Muscle Activation during Plank Exercise

This study aimed to compare rectus abdominis (RA) and anterior deltoid (AD) muscle activation during plank exercise performed on different unstable surfaces. Sixteen recreationally active males participated in this study. A ground surface was used as a stable surface (SS), whereas gymnastics rings (GR) and the Bosu ball (BB) were used as unstable surfaces. Under the dual instability (DI) condition, participants placed their feet in the GR and elbows on the BB. Participants performed plank exercise under four different conditions. Muscle activation was measured in the upper rectus abdominis (URA), lower rectus abdominis (LRA), and anterior deltoid (AD) muscles during plank exercise. One way repeated‐measures analysis of variance was used to statistically compare muscle activation among the conditions. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Analysis showed that URA muscle activity was significantly greater under the DI condition than under the SS and BB conditions. In addition, URA muscle activity was greater under the GR than the SS condition. LRA muscle activity was significantly greater under the DI condition compared to the other conditions. In contrast, AD muscle activity was greater under the SS than the DI condition. In conclusion, these findings indicated that RA muscle activation was greatest on the dual instability surface, while AD muscle activation was greatest on the stable surface. Dual instability plank exercise may be a better choice than single instability and stable surface plank exercise for URA and LRA activation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Kinetics
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/203417
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Surface Stability on Muscle Activation during Plank Exercise

Erkan Demirkan, Burak GÜNDOĞAN, Erbil Murat Aydın, Michael Favre et al.
Journal of Human Kinetics
Sports Performance and Training
article

Effects of Surface Stability on Muscle Activation during Plank Exercise

Erkan Demirkan, Burak GÜNDOĞAN, Erbil Murat Aydın, Michael Favre, Ali Fatih SAĞLAM
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to compare rectus abdominis (RA) and anterior deltoid (AD) muscle activation during plank exercise performed on different unstable surfaces. Sixteen recreationally active males participated in this study. A ground surface was used as a stable surface (SS), whereas gymnastics rings (GR) and the Bosu ball (BB) were used as unstable surfaces. Under the dual instability (DI) condition, participants placed their feet in the GR and elbows on the BB. Participants performed plank exercise under four different conditions. Muscle activation was measured in the upper rectus abdominis (URA), lower rectus abdominis (LRA), and anterior deltoid (AD) muscles during plank exercise. One way repeated‐measures analysis of variance was used to statistically compare muscle activation among the conditions. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Analysis showed that URA muscle activity was significantly greater under the DI condition than under the SS and BB conditions. In addition, URA muscle activity was greater under the GR than the SS condition. LRA muscle activity was significantly greater under the DI condition compared to the other conditions. In contrast, AD muscle activity was greater under the SS than the DI condition. In conclusion, these findings indicated that RA muscle activation was greatest on the dual instability surface, while AD muscle activation was greatest on the stable surface. Dual instability plank exercise may be a better choice than single instability and stable surface plank exercise for URA and LRA activation.

Journal of Human Kinetics
Hitit Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.