Gas Sensor Selectivity Assessment Indicator of Fill Factor from Response Curve: A Case Study on WS <sub>2</sub> -Based Ammonia Gas Sensors

With the advancement of smart detection technologies, gas sensors have gained increasingly widespread applications in environmental monitoring, industrial safety, medical diagnostics, and intelligent agriculture. The response curve of a single gas sensor is conventionally used to calculate sensor performance evaluation parameters of response/recovery time and response value. The selectivity of a single sensor is currently evaluated by a selectivity coefficient based on the response value, which faces difficulty in distinguishing gases with different concentrations. In this study, a new metric of fill factor (FF) derived from response curve morphology features was introduced to offer a novel solution for single-sensor selectivity analysis. Three variants of the novel metrics, FF<sub>res</sub> (response phase fill factor), FF<sub>rec</sub> (recovery phase fill factor), and FF (total fill factor), can be calculated from the response curve. As a proof-of-concept, the FFs of WS<sub>2</sub>, WS<sub>2</sub>@PANI, and Au/PANI/WS<sub>2</sub> sensors at different concentrations of ammonia, acetone, methanol, ethanol, and water vapor were calculated and used for gas selectivity analysis. Results demonstrated distinct FF ranges for ammonia and other gases, validating FF as a potential selectivity indicator. This approach provides a multidimensional analysis framework for enhanced single-sensor discrimination by constructing a parameter space incorporating curve morphology features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Sensors
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.5c01453
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gas Sensor Selectivity Assessment Indicator of Fill Factor from Response Curve: A Case Study on WS 2 -Based Ammonia Gas Sensors

Chengli Tang, Ming Li, Peng Wang, Zhiyuan Zhu
1 citations
ACS Sensors
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
0.73
article

Gas Sensor Selectivity Assessment Indicator of Fill Factor from Response Curve: A Case Study on WS 2 -Based Ammonia Gas Sensors

Chengli Tang, Ming Li, Peng Wang, Zhiyuan Zhu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With the advancement of smart detection technologies, gas sensors have gained increasingly widespread applications in environmental monitoring, industrial safety, medical diagnostics, and intelligent agriculture. The response curve of a single gas sensor is conventionally used to calculate sensor performance evaluation parameters of response/recovery time and response value. The selectivity of a single sensor is currently evaluated by a selectivity coefficient based on the response value, which faces difficulty in distinguishing gases with different concentrations. In this study, a new metric of fill factor (FF) derived from response curve morphology features was introduced to offer a novel solution for single-sensor selectivity analysis. Three variants of the novel metrics, FF<sub>res</sub> (response phase fill factor), FF<sub>rec</sub> (recovery phase fill factor), and FF (total fill factor), can be calculated from the response curve. As a proof-of-concept, the FFs of WS<sub>2</sub>, WS<sub>2</sub>@PANI, and Au/PANI/WS<sub>2</sub> sensors at different concentrations of ammonia, acetone, methanol, ethanol, and water vapor were calculated and used for gas selectivity analysis. Results demonstrated distinct FF ranges for ammonia and other gases, validating FF as a potential selectivity indicator. This approach provides a multidimensional analysis framework for enhanced single-sensor discrimination by constructing a parameter space incorporating curve morphology features.

ACS SensorsVol. 10(10)
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (CN), Jiaxing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.