The Kids’ Behavior in Context Scales (KICS) I: Teacher, Caregiver, and Youth Views on Needs and Goals for Intervention

Adults (e.g., caregivers, teachers) play a key role in youth mental health services, even as the perspectives of youth themselves are also critical to intervention success. Prior studies indicate that caregivers and youth frequently disagree on the rationale for the interventions youth receive (i.e., needs for intervention) and the plan for achieving intervention success (i.e., goals for intervention). Yet, all previous work is based on clinic samples. None have included the perspectives of teachers. We developed the Kids’ Behavior in Context Scales (KICS) to assess the contexts in which youth needs and goals manifest, which requires psychometrically sound procedures for detecting needs and goals. A school-based sample of 173 sixth- to eighth-grade youth, their caregivers, and their teachers each identified needs for intervention (e.g., aggression, anxiety, inattention), as well as goals for intervention (e.g., controlling impulses, building healthy relationships, relaxation). We observed low levels of between-informant agreement on needs and goals for intervention, with kappas ranging from .01 to .11. For only 2% of youth, all three informants endorsed the same pair of needs and goals. The KICS reveals that informant disagreements occur more frequently in school-based assessments relative to other service environments (e.g., hospitals, community mental health clinics).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Disorders
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429251371076
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Kids’ Behavior in Context Scales (KICS) I: Teacher, Caregiver, and Youth Views on Needs and Goals for Intervention

Elizabeth Talbott, Andres De Los Reyes, Bridget A. Makol, Tatang Herman et al.
Behavioral Disorders
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

The Kids’ Behavior in Context Scales (KICS) I: Teacher, Caregiver, and Youth Views on Needs and Goals for Intervention

Elizabeth Talbott, Andres De Los Reyes, Bridget A. Makol, Tatang Herman, E W Fine, Bryce D. McLeod, Mo Wang, A. Muri Yusuf
article en

Abstract

Adults (e.g., caregivers, teachers) play a key role in youth mental health services, even as the perspectives of youth themselves are also critical to intervention success. Prior studies indicate that caregivers and youth frequently disagree on the rationale for the interventions youth receive (i.e., needs for intervention) and the plan for achieving intervention success (i.e., goals for intervention). Yet, all previous work is based on clinic samples. None have included the perspectives of teachers. We developed the Kids’ Behavior in Context Scales (KICS) to assess the contexts in which youth needs and goals manifest, which requires psychometrically sound procedures for detecting needs and goals. A school-based sample of 173 sixth- to eighth-grade youth, their caregivers, and their teachers each identified needs for intervention (e.g., aggression, anxiety, inattention), as well as goals for intervention (e.g., controlling impulses, building healthy relationships, relaxation). We observed low levels of between-informant agreement on needs and goals for intervention, with kappas ranging from .01 to .11. For only 2% of youth, all three informants endorsed the same pair of needs and goals. The KICS reveals that informant disagreements occur more frequently in school-based assessments relative to other service environments (e.g., hospitals, community mental health clinics).

Behavioral DisordersVol. 51(2)
Rush University Medical Center (US), William & Mary (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Williams (United States) (US), University of Florida (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.