Factors of bias in spheroid-based drug screening: Fabrication method, spheroid size, and cell viability

Spheroids have emerged as powerful tools in drug screening by providing a physiologically relevant environment that more closely mimics in vivo conditions compared to 2D cultures. Despite these advantages, experimental outcomes using spheroids are often influenced by considerable variability and bias. This review explores three key factors that affect the evaluation of drug efficacy in spheroids, including fabrication method, spheroid size, and cell viability. First, it compares five commonly used spheroid fabrication platforms, outlining their principles, advantages, and limitations. Second, it examines biological contributors to spheroid size variation, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, protein expression, and cellular differentiation, and how they affect drug response. Third, it discusses how features such as hypoxic core development and anoikis sensitivity affect cell viability and potentially distort toxicity assessments. This review presents a conceptual framework for minimizing bias and improving reproducibility in spheroid-based drug screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118597
Citations
2
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors of bias in spheroid-based drug screening: Fabrication method, spheroid size, and cell viability

Sunghan Lee, Jiseok Lim, Bongseop Kwak
2 citations
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
1.35
article

Factors of bias in spheroid-based drug screening: Fabrication method, spheroid size, and cell viability

Sunghan Lee, Jiseok Lim, Bongseop Kwak
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Spheroids have emerged as powerful tools in drug screening by providing a physiologically relevant environment that more closely mimics in vivo conditions compared to 2D cultures. Despite these advantages, experimental outcomes using spheroids are often influenced by considerable variability and bias. This review explores three key factors that affect the evaluation of drug efficacy in spheroids, including fabrication method, spheroid size, and cell viability. First, it compares five commonly used spheroid fabrication platforms, outlining their principles, advantages, and limitations. Second, it examines biological contributors to spheroid size variation, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, protein expression, and cellular differentiation, and how they affect drug response. Third, it discusses how features such as hypoxic core development and anoikis sensitivity affect cell viability and potentially distort toxicity assessments. This review presents a conceptual framework for minimizing bias and improving reproducibility in spheroid-based drug screening.

Biomedicine & PharmacotherapyVol. 192
Dongguk University (KR), Yeungnam University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Factors of bias in spheroid-based drug screening: Fabrication method, spheroid size, and cell viability — Sunghan Lee, Jiseok Lim, et al. · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS