Modeling arbitrarily applicable relational responding with the non-axiomatic reasoning system: a Machine Psychology approach

Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding (AARR) is a cornerstone of human language and reasoning, referring to the learned ability to relate symbols in flexible, context-dependent ways. In this paper, we present a novel theoretical approach for modeling AARR within an artificial intelligence framework using the Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System (NARS). NARS is an adaptive reasoning system designed for learning under uncertainty. We introduce a theoretical mechanism called <i>acquired relations</i>, enabling NARS to derive symbolic relational knowledge directly from sensorimotor experiences. By integrating principles from Relational Frame Theory-the behavioral psychology account of AARR-with the reasoning mechanisms of NARS, we conceptually demonstrate how key properties of AARR (mutual entailment, combinatorial entailment, and transformation of stimulus functions) can emerge from NARS's inference rules and memory structures. Two theoretical demonstrations illustrate this approach: one modeling stimulus equivalence and transfer of function, and another modeling complex relational networks involving opposition frames. In both cases, the system logically demonstrates the derivation of untrained relations and context-sensitive transformations of stimulus functions, mirroring established human cognitive phenomena. These results suggest that AARR-long considered uniquely human-can be conceptually captured by suitably designed AI systems, emphasizing the value of integrating behavioral science insights into artificial general intelligence (AGI) research. Empirical validation of this theoretical approach remains an essential future direction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2025.1586033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling arbitrarily applicable relational responding with the non-axiomatic reasoning system: a Machine Psychology approach

Robert Johansson
1 citations
Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Complex Systems and Decision Making
2.11
article

Modeling arbitrarily applicable relational responding with the non-axiomatic reasoning system: a Machine Psychology approach

Robert Johansson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding (AARR) is a cornerstone of human language and reasoning, referring to the learned ability to relate symbols in flexible, context-dependent ways. In this paper, we present a novel theoretical approach for modeling AARR within an artificial intelligence framework using the Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System (NARS). NARS is an adaptive reasoning system designed for learning under uncertainty. We introduce a theoretical mechanism called <i>acquired relations</i>, enabling NARS to derive symbolic relational knowledge directly from sensorimotor experiences. By integrating principles from Relational Frame Theory-the behavioral psychology account of AARR-with the reasoning mechanisms of NARS, we conceptually demonstrate how key properties of AARR (mutual entailment, combinatorial entailment, and transformation of stimulus functions) can emerge from NARS's inference rules and memory structures. Two theoretical demonstrations illustrate this approach: one modeling stimulus equivalence and transfer of function, and another modeling complex relational networks involving opposition frames. In both cases, the system logically demonstrates the derivation of untrained relations and context-sensitive transformations of stimulus functions, mirroring established human cognitive phenomena. These results suggest that AARR-long considered uniquely human-can be conceptually captured by suitably designed AI systems, emphasizing the value of integrating behavioral science insights into artificial general intelligence (AGI) research. Empirical validation of this theoretical approach remains an essential future direction.

Frontiers in Robotics and AIVol. 12
Stockholm University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.