Addressing Differences in Cancer: A Framework for Synergistic Programming in Cancer Prevention and Control

ABSTRACT Background Cancer remains a leading cause of death worldwide and disproportionately impacts certain populations. Several frameworks have been developed that illustrate the multiple determinants of cancer. We expand on these frameworks to present an applied framework for cancer prevention and control designed to help better address differences in cancer outcomes. Methods The framework was developed by the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network's Health Behaviors Workgroup. A draft was developed based on workgroup discussion, public health theory, and rapid literature review on the determinants of cancer. The framework was refined through interviews and focus groups with federally qualified health center providers and individuals with cancer, who provided feedback on the framework's causal pathways, completeness, and applicability to cancer. Results The framework provides an overview of the relationships between sociodemographic inequalities, social/structural determinants, and risk factors associated with cancer across the lifespan. The framework emphasizes how health‐risk behaviors interact with psychological, psychosocial, and biological risk factors. Importantly, the framework emphasizes addressing social and structural determinants that influence health behaviors to reduce the burden of cancer and improve health equity. Our framework underscores the importance of addressing co‐occurring risk factors and assessing how multiple forms of inequality or disadvantage intersect to increase cancer risk. Conclusions This paper presents an applied framework for cancer prevention and control to address cancer differences. Because the framework highlights determinants and factors that influence cancer risk at multiple levels, it can be used to inform the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions addressing cancer morbidity and mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lifestyle Medicine
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lim2.70038
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing Differences in Cancer: A Framework for Synergistic Programming in Cancer Prevention and Control

Mark W. Vander Weg, Purnima Madhivanan, Rachel Hirschey, Mayank Sakhuja et al.
Lifestyle Medicine
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

Addressing Differences in Cancer: A Framework for Synergistic Programming in Cancer Prevention and Control

Mark W. Vander Weg, Purnima Madhivanan, Rachel Hirschey, Mayank Sakhuja, Emanuelle Dias, Nivedhitha Parthasarathy, Meghan B. Skiba, James R. Hébert, Christine M. Kava, Alexandra B. Morshed, Ciaran M. Fairman, Kristin Beima‐Sofie, Jingxi Sheng, Beverly B. Green, Jessica Gorzelitz, Manal Masud
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Cancer remains a leading cause of death worldwide and disproportionately impacts certain populations. Several frameworks have been developed that illustrate the multiple determinants of cancer. We expand on these frameworks to present an applied framework for cancer prevention and control designed to help better address differences in cancer outcomes. Methods The framework was developed by the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network's Health Behaviors Workgroup. A draft was developed based on workgroup discussion, public health theory, and rapid literature review on the determinants of cancer. The framework was refined through interviews and focus groups with federally qualified health center providers and individuals with cancer, who provided feedback on the framework's causal pathways, completeness, and applicability to cancer. Results The framework provides an overview of the relationships between sociodemographic inequalities, social/structural determinants, and risk factors associated with cancer across the lifespan. The framework emphasizes how health‐risk behaviors interact with psychological, psychosocial, and biological risk factors. Importantly, the framework emphasizes addressing social and structural determinants that influence health behaviors to reduce the burden of cancer and improve health equity. Our framework underscores the importance of addressing co‐occurring risk factors and assessing how multiple forms of inequality or disadvantage intersect to increase cancer risk. Conclusions This paper presents an applied framework for cancer prevention and control to address cancer differences. Because the framework highlights determinants and factors that influence cancer risk at multiple levels, it can be used to inform the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions addressing cancer morbidity and mortality.

Lifestyle MedicineVol. 6(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Iowa (US), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Arizona (US), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US), Emory University (US), University of South Carolina (US), University of Washington (US), Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice (US), Arizona Science Center (US), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US), Epidemic Intelligence Service (US), Iowa City VA Health Care System (US), University of Iowa Health Care (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.