Bridging the Security Gap: An Empirical Analysis of LLM-API Integration Vulnerabilities and Mitigation Strategies

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) through Web APIs into modern software systems presents unique security challenges that extend beyond traditional API security concerns. This paper examines the intersection of conventional API security and LLM-specific vulnerabilities, focusing on the implications of non-deterministic behavior and emergent computational capabilities in LLM-powered services. Through a comprehensive triangulation methodology combining OpenAPI specification analysis of 4289 public APIs, expert validation from ten domain specialists, and systematic adversarial testing, we investigate current security practices and their effectiveness in LLM-API integrations. Our findings reveal significant gaps between traditional API security mechanisms and LLM-specific security requirements, particularly in areas of authentication, transport layer security, and fairness implementations. Analysis of major LLM providers demonstrates varied security attribute implementation, with privacy protection showing consistent high performance (>89%) across providers, while fairness metrics exhibit substantial variation (40.8-73.5%). The research contributes to the field by identifying critical security challenges in LLM-API integration and proposing structured approaches for developing more robust security measures. Using the Goal Question Metric (GQM) approach, we outline future directions for practical implementation guidelines and standardization efforts to address the unique security requirements of LLM-integrated systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3731806.3731831
Primary Topic
Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Security Gap: An Empirical Analysis of LLM-API Integration Vulnerabilities and Mitigation Strategies

Sandro Hartenstein
Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
article

Bridging the Security Gap: An Empirical Analysis of LLM-API Integration Vulnerabilities and Mitigation Strategies

Sandro Hartenstein
article en

Abstract

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) through Web APIs into modern software systems presents unique security challenges that extend beyond traditional API security concerns. This paper examines the intersection of conventional API security and LLM-specific vulnerabilities, focusing on the implications of non-deterministic behavior and emergent computational capabilities in LLM-powered services. Through a comprehensive triangulation methodology combining OpenAPI specification analysis of 4289 public APIs, expert validation from ten domain specialists, and systematic adversarial testing, we investigate current security practices and their effectiveness in LLM-API integrations. Our findings reveal significant gaps between traditional API security mechanisms and LLM-specific security requirements, particularly in areas of authentication, transport layer security, and fairness implementations. Analysis of major LLM providers demonstrates varied security attribute implementation, with privacy protection showing consistent high performance (>89%) across providers, while fairness metrics exhibit substantial variation (40.8-73.5%). The research contributes to the field by identifying critical security challenges in LLM-API integration and proposing structured approaches for developing more robust security measures. Using the Goal Question Metric (GQM) approach, we outline future directions for practical implementation guidelines and standardization efforts to address the unique security requirements of LLM-integrated systems.

HTW Berlin - University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.