Understanding future adoption of autonomous vehicle services among disabled and non-disabled users

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are poised to transform mobility, yet their adoption depends on both subjective and objective factors. While objective factors like cost and accessibility are well studied, subjective factors, such as trust, perceived safety, and wellbeing, become particularly crucial when users may have not yet experienced these new transport modes. Existing research often treats AVs as a singular concept, overlooking the diversity of AV services and their varying appeal across populations. This study bridges this gap by comparing adoption preferences for multiple AV services, including AV Taxis, AV Remote Taxis, AV Micro Cars, AV Private Cars and AV Buses, across disabled and non-disabled populations. Using sentiment analysis and statistical analysis, we examine how wellbeing, assistance availability, design etc. influence transport choices. Findings vary across mental health, physical health, and non-disabled populations for different AV services. These insights provide a framework for policymakers and industry leaders to design equitable and inclusive AV systems globally.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101602
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding future adoption of autonomous vehicle services among disabled and non-disabled users

Roger Woodman, Shravani Sharma, Neel Ocean, Mark T. Elliott
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Understanding future adoption of autonomous vehicle services among disabled and non-disabled users

Roger Woodman, Shravani Sharma, Neel Ocean, Mark T. Elliott
article en

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are poised to transform mobility, yet their adoption depends on both subjective and objective factors. While objective factors like cost and accessibility are well studied, subjective factors, such as trust, perceived safety, and wellbeing, become particularly crucial when users may have not yet experienced these new transport modes. Existing research often treats AVs as a singular concept, overlooking the diversity of AV services and their varying appeal across populations. This study bridges this gap by comparing adoption preferences for multiple AV services, including AV Taxis, AV Remote Taxis, AV Micro Cars, AV Private Cars and AV Buses, across disabled and non-disabled populations. Using sentiment analysis and statistical analysis, we examine how wellbeing, assistance availability, design etc. influence transport choices. Findings vary across mental health, physical health, and non-disabled populations for different AV services. These insights provide a framework for policymakers and industry leaders to design equitable and inclusive AV systems globally.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 34
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding future adoption of autonomous vehicle services among disabled and non-disabled users — Roger Woodman, Shravani Sharma, et al. · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS