Life cycle assessment of contrasting grazing systems within a yearling stocker stage of beef cattle production

Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to compare the environmental impacts of three grazing systems for beef cattle backgrounding in North Florida. The systems were grass + clover (GL), grass + clover + rhizoma peanut (GLRP), and grass + nitrogen fertilizer (GN). Our hypothesis was that incorporating legumes into grazing systems decreases reliance on fossil fuels and inorganic fertilizers and reduces the environmental impact of beef production systems. The LCA assessed five environmental impact categories: global warming potential, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, fossil fuel scarcity, and acidification potential. A cradle-to-farm gate system boundary encompassed the processes within the backgrounding stage. The functional unit adopted was 1 kg of liveweight gain. Results indicated that the GN system had the greatest environmental impacts, driven primarily by elevated nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from synthetic N fertilizer use and methane (CH 4 ) emissions from enteric fermentation, along with greater fossil fuel consumption associated with fertilizer production and application. In contrast, GLRP impacted the environment less across all categories. This was attributed to legume biological N fixation, which reduced the need for synthetic fertilizers and, consequently, decreased greenhouse gas emissions, eutrophication potential, and acidification. This study highlights the potential of legume integration into grazing systems, particularly GLRP, as an alternative to N-fertilized grass systems. By reducing reliance on synthetic fertilizers and mitigating environmental impacts, GLRP enhanced the sustainability of beef production in North Florida. These findings document the value of legumes for improving the environmental performance of livestock systems, particularly as global demand for sustainable food production intensifies. • Life cycle assessment compared legume-integrated and nitrogen-fertilized grazing systems for beef cattle. • Legume-based systems reduced environmental impacts across all categories, especially greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient runoff. • Conventional grass-nitrogen systems had higher emissions and fossil fuel use due to synthetic fertilizer dependence. • Results support legume integration as a strategy for sustainable beef production in the southeastern U.S.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102370
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment of contrasting grazing systems within a yearling stocker stage of beef cattle production

Igor L. Bretas, Cheryl Mackowiak, Beatriz Elisa Bizzuti, Ana Martin‐Ryals et al.
1 citations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

Life cycle assessment of contrasting grazing systems within a yearling stocker stage of beef cattle production

Igor L. Bretas, Cheryl Mackowiak, Beatriz Elisa Bizzuti, Ana Martin‐Ryals, Lynn E. Sollenberger, Martin Ruiz‐Moreno, Luana M. D. Queiroz, José Carlos Batista Dubeux, Flávia Fernanda Simili, M. A. Lira, Kenneth T. Oduor, Liza Garcia, Nicolás DiLorenzo, Kevin R. Trumpp, Javier Portuguez-Acuña
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to compare the environmental impacts of three grazing systems for beef cattle backgrounding in North Florida. The systems were grass + clover (GL), grass + clover + rhizoma peanut (GLRP), and grass + nitrogen fertilizer (GN). Our hypothesis was that incorporating legumes into grazing systems decreases reliance on fossil fuels and inorganic fertilizers and reduces the environmental impact of beef production systems. The LCA assessed five environmental impact categories: global warming potential, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, fossil fuel scarcity, and acidification potential. A cradle-to-farm gate system boundary encompassed the processes within the backgrounding stage. The functional unit adopted was 1 kg of liveweight gain. Results indicated that the GN system had the greatest environmental impacts, driven primarily by elevated nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from synthetic N fertilizer use and methane (CH 4 ) emissions from enteric fermentation, along with greater fossil fuel consumption associated with fertilizer production and application. In contrast, GLRP impacted the environment less across all categories. This was attributed to legume biological N fixation, which reduced the need for synthetic fertilizers and, consequently, decreased greenhouse gas emissions, eutrophication potential, and acidification. This study highlights the potential of legume integration into grazing systems, particularly GLRP, as an alternative to N-fertilized grass systems. By reducing reliance on synthetic fertilizers and mitigating environmental impacts, GLRP enhanced the sustainability of beef production in North Florida. These findings document the value of legumes for improving the environmental performance of livestock systems, particularly as global demand for sustainable food production intensifies. • Life cycle assessment compared legume-integrated and nitrogen-fertilized grazing systems for beef cattle. • Legume-based systems reduced environmental impacts across all categories, especially greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient runoff. • Conventional grass-nitrogen systems had higher emissions and fossil fuel use due to synthetic fertilizer dependence. • Results support legume integration as a strategy for sustainable beef production in the southeastern U.S.

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 24
University of North Florida (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Florida (US), Institute of Animal Science and Pastures (BR), Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (BR), Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.