How novice doctoral co-supervisors promote well-being in PhD students

Purpose This paper aims to explore how novice doctoral co-supervisors promote PhD students’ well-being. It provides a more nuanced understanding of how early-career academics engage with the relational and emotionally complex nature of co-supervision. Design/methodology/approach The qualitative study draws on 25 in-depth interviews with novice co-supervisors at two research-intensive universities in Sweden. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis within a symbolic interactionist framework. Findings The results reveal that novice co-supervisors promote PhD students’ well-being. Drawing on their social expertise, they contribute by reducing social isolation, structuring the supervisory process, fostering scholarly independence and creating opportunities for open dialogue about well-being. Practical implications This study can serve as a basis for discussions about novice co-supervisory roles and their involvement in PhD student well-being. It also highlights that new supervisors may require support structures at multiple levels – clear policies, structured team induction, training, mentoring and, above all, a supportive supervisory culture. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in its close look at the role of novice doctoral co-supervisors. Using a symbolic interactionist lens, it shows how everyday relational practices can become part of the structure of supervision. Its value lies in highlighting how novice co-supervisors help shift supervision towards a more supportive and caring culture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-06-2024-0064
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How novice doctoral co-supervisors promote well-being in PhD students

Cecilia Almlöv, Kristina Edström, Lars Geschwind
2 citations
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
5.63
article

How novice doctoral co-supervisors promote well-being in PhD students

Cecilia Almlöv, Kristina Edström, Lars Geschwind
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore how novice doctoral co-supervisors promote PhD students’ well-being. It provides a more nuanced understanding of how early-career academics engage with the relational and emotionally complex nature of co-supervision. Design/methodology/approach The qualitative study draws on 25 in-depth interviews with novice co-supervisors at two research-intensive universities in Sweden. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis within a symbolic interactionist framework. Findings The results reveal that novice co-supervisors promote PhD students’ well-being. Drawing on their social expertise, they contribute by reducing social isolation, structuring the supervisory process, fostering scholarly independence and creating opportunities for open dialogue about well-being. Practical implications This study can serve as a basis for discussions about novice co-supervisory roles and their involvement in PhD student well-being. It also highlights that new supervisors may require support structures at multiple levels – clear policies, structured team induction, training, mentoring and, above all, a supportive supervisory culture. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in its close look at the role of novice doctoral co-supervisors. Using a symbolic interactionist lens, it shows how everyday relational practices can become part of the structure of supervision. Its value lies in highlighting how novice co-supervisors help shift supervision towards a more supportive and caring culture.

Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.