Antioxidant Profiling, In Silico Toxicity, and Virtual Bioactivity Assessment of Selected Plant-Derived Phenolics

<strong>Background and Aim: </strong>Oxidative stress is a major contributing factor in the pathogenesis of many diseases. However, approaches to reduce oxidative stress, such as the use of antioxidants, are thought to be potentially protective. Towards this goal, the antioxidant potential of 38 plant phenolics from various chemical classes was screened through <em>in vitro </em>methods in the current work. <strong>Methods: </strong>The phenolic compounds were tested for their metal chelation and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity along with copper-reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) and ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays at 10 mM. <em>In silico </em>toxicity and adverse effect estimations, as well as the potential bioactivity probabilities of the compounds, were assessed through PASS and Swiss prediction programs. <strong>Results: </strong>All the tested compounds displayed metal chelation activity below 50%, while the highest chelating capacity was exhibited by vitexin (44.12 ± 0.09%). Twenty-two of the compounds displayed a scavenging effect of over 50%, where the highest scavenging effect was caused by oleuropein (87.05 ± 0.05%). In the CUPRAC and FRAP assays, all compounds exhibited remarkable levels of antioxidant activity. The most active ones in the CUPRAC assay were lined up according to their absorbance values as compared to quercetin (3.99 ± 0.01, the reference) as isoquercitrin (3.99 ± 0.01), luteolin (3.96 ± 0.05), myricetin (3.78 ± 0.11), kaempferol (3.60 ± 0.28), morin (3.48 ± 0.26), catechin (3.33 ± 0.28), and hyperoside (3.11 ± 0.50). All compounds possessed FRAP values close to or better than the reference (i.e., quercetin). Our data reveals that the tested phenolics match well with the <em>in silico</em> estimations considering their antioxidant effects, which is the <em>in silico</em> first data on them in this regard. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our extensive screening indicated oleuropein, gallic acid, taxifolin, rosmarinic acid, catechin, quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, myricetin, hyperoside, morin, isoquercitrin, fisetin, epigallocatechin gallate, and vitexin as the most promising phenolic antioxidants in the current work.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Istanbul Journal of Pharmacy
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26650/istanbuljpharm.2025.1533301
Primary Topic
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antioxidant Profiling, In Silico Toxicity, and Virtual Bioactivity Assessment of Selected Plant-Derived Phenolics

Esra Emerce, İlkay Erdoğan Orhan, Tuğba Uçar Akyürek, Meltem Karaküçük et al.
Istanbul Journal of Pharmacy
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
article

Antioxidant Profiling, In Silico Toxicity, and Virtual Bioactivity Assessment of Selected Plant-Derived Phenolics

Esra Emerce, İlkay Erdoğan Orhan, Tuğba Uçar Akyürek, Meltem Karaküçük, Fatma Şenol Deniz
article en

Abstract

<strong>Background and Aim: </strong>Oxidative stress is a major contributing factor in the pathogenesis of many diseases. However, approaches to reduce oxidative stress, such as the use of antioxidants, are thought to be potentially protective. Towards this goal, the antioxidant potential of 38 plant phenolics from various chemical classes was screened through <em>in vitro </em>methods in the current work. <strong>Methods: </strong>The phenolic compounds were tested for their metal chelation and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity along with copper-reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) and ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays at 10 mM. <em>In silico </em>toxicity and adverse effect estimations, as well as the potential bioactivity probabilities of the compounds, were assessed through PASS and Swiss prediction programs. <strong>Results: </strong>All the tested compounds displayed metal chelation activity below 50%, while the highest chelating capacity was exhibited by vitexin (44.12 ± 0.09%). Twenty-two of the compounds displayed a scavenging effect of over 50%, where the highest scavenging effect was caused by oleuropein (87.05 ± 0.05%). In the CUPRAC and FRAP assays, all compounds exhibited remarkable levels of antioxidant activity. The most active ones in the CUPRAC assay were lined up according to their absorbance values as compared to quercetin (3.99 ± 0.01, the reference) as isoquercitrin (3.99 ± 0.01), luteolin (3.96 ± 0.05), myricetin (3.78 ± 0.11), kaempferol (3.60 ± 0.28), morin (3.48 ± 0.26), catechin (3.33 ± 0.28), and hyperoside (3.11 ± 0.50). All compounds possessed FRAP values close to or better than the reference (i.e., quercetin). Our data reveals that the tested phenolics match well with the <em>in silico</em> estimations considering their antioxidant effects, which is the <em>in silico</em> first data on them in this regard. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our extensive screening indicated oleuropein, gallic acid, taxifolin, rosmarinic acid, catechin, quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, myricetin, hyperoside, morin, isoquercitrin, fisetin, epigallocatechin gallate, and vitexin as the most promising phenolic antioxidants in the current work.

Istanbul Journal of PharmacyVol. 55(2)
Gazi Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.