Analyzing key controlling factors of shale reservoir heterogeneity in "thin" stratigraphic settings: A deep learning-aided case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, Fuyan Syncline, Northern Guizhou

The Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation shales are key targets for shale gas exploration, but they are often studied as a single stratigraphic unit with limited analysis of internal differences. This study combines traditional geological methods with deep learning to compare the reservoir characteristics of the Wufeng Formation, the first member of the Longmaxi Formation (Long 1), and the second member of the Longmaxi Formation (Long 2), identifying the main controlling factors of differences. We found that: (1) The Wufeng Formation primarily develops siliceous shale lithofacies (S), mixed siliceous shale lithofacies (S-2), and clay siliceous shale lithofacies (S-3). Long 1 develops mixed siliceous shale lithofacies (S-2) and clay siliceous shale lithofacies (S-3), while Long 2 exhibits clay and siliceous mixed shale lithofacies (M-2) and siliceous clay shale lithofacies (CM-1). (2) The YOLO-v8 model demonstrates higher accuracy in shale pore type detection than the YOLO-v10 model, with a maximum mAP of 78.9 %. Using the YOLO-v8 model, it was found that S, S-2, and S-3 lithofacies are dominated by dissolution pores and organic pores with larger specific surface areas and porosities, while CM-1 and M-2 lithofacies are characterized by dissolution pores with smaller specific surface areas and porosities. (3) Based on evaluation indicators such as TOC content, BET surface area, porosity, brittleness index, and gas content, S and S-2 are classified as Class I lithofacies, S-3 as Class II lithofacies, and M-2 and CM-1 as Class III lithofacies. The main controlling factor for the heterogeneity of the shale reservoirs in the study area is lithofacies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2025.100293
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing key controlling factors of shale reservoir heterogeneity in "thin" stratigraphic settings: A deep learning-aided case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, Fuyan Syncline, Northern Guizhou

Zhidong Bao, Ye Tao, Fukang Ma
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Analyzing key controlling factors of shale reservoir heterogeneity in "thin" stratigraphic settings: A deep learning-aided case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, Fuyan Syncline, Northern Guizhou

Zhidong Bao, Ye Tao, Fukang Ma
article en

Abstract

The Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation shales are key targets for shale gas exploration, but they are often studied as a single stratigraphic unit with limited analysis of internal differences. This study combines traditional geological methods with deep learning to compare the reservoir characteristics of the Wufeng Formation, the first member of the Longmaxi Formation (Long 1), and the second member of the Longmaxi Formation (Long 2), identifying the main controlling factors of differences. We found that: (1) The Wufeng Formation primarily develops siliceous shale lithofacies (S), mixed siliceous shale lithofacies (S-2), and clay siliceous shale lithofacies (S-3). Long 1 develops mixed siliceous shale lithofacies (S-2) and clay siliceous shale lithofacies (S-3), while Long 2 exhibits clay and siliceous mixed shale lithofacies (M-2) and siliceous clay shale lithofacies (CM-1). (2) The YOLO-v8 model demonstrates higher accuracy in shale pore type detection than the YOLO-v10 model, with a maximum mAP of 78.9 %. Using the YOLO-v8 model, it was found that S, S-2, and S-3 lithofacies are dominated by dissolution pores and organic pores with larger specific surface areas and porosities, while CM-1 and M-2 lithofacies are characterized by dissolution pores with smaller specific surface areas and porosities. (3) Based on evaluation indicators such as TOC content, BET surface area, porosity, brittleness index, and gas content, S and S-2 are classified as Class I lithofacies, S-3 as Class II lithofacies, and M-2 and CM-1 as Class III lithofacies. The main controlling factor for the heterogeneity of the shale reservoirs in the study area is lithofacies.

Applied Computing and GeosciencesVol. 28
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.