Escape the Metrics: The Consequences of Quantitative Approaches in Law

Abstract Can the subject be reduced to a set of metrics? This article seeks to address the challenge of reducing complex social issues to easily commensurable values, examining the implications and potential drawbacks of this approach. To obtain these values we use various measurements, calculations, techniques, and similar natural sciences. The author reflects on the rational nature of such reductive solutions, emphasising their ability to bring clarity to the complex world around us. Seemingly free of ideological overtones and external influences, they present us with hard facts to rely on. But what if this ‘quantitative turn’ in law marks the possibility of ideology becoming stronger than ever? The author concludes that the pervasive ‘ideology of metrics’ in public discourse demands critical examination and provides considerations for the fostering of a nuanced perspective, urging a cautious approach as to what may seem like self-evident laws of computation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Critique
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-025-09431-x
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Escape the Metrics: The Consequences of Quantitative Approaches in Law

Tomáš Havlíček
Law and Critique
Human Rights and Development
article

Escape the Metrics: The Consequences of Quantitative Approaches in Law

Tomáš Havlíček
article en

Abstract

Abstract Can the subject be reduced to a set of metrics? This article seeks to address the challenge of reducing complex social issues to easily commensurable values, examining the implications and potential drawbacks of this approach. To obtain these values we use various measurements, calculations, techniques, and similar natural sciences. The author reflects on the rational nature of such reductive solutions, emphasising their ability to bring clarity to the complex world around us. Seemingly free of ideological overtones and external influences, they present us with hard facts to rely on. But what if this ‘quantitative turn’ in law marks the possibility of ideology becoming stronger than ever? The author concludes that the pervasive ‘ideology of metrics’ in public discourse demands critical examination and provides considerations for the fostering of a nuanced perspective, urging a cautious approach as to what may seem like self-evident laws of computation.

Law and CritiqueVol. 37(1)
Masaryk University (CZ)
Masarykova Univerzita
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.