Debates on Narodnost in Russian Intellectual Culture: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (“Round Table” Materials)

In November 2024, a “round-table” was held on the topic: “Debates on Narod­nost in Russian Intellectual Culture: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow”. The discus­sion was initiated by the journal Voprosy Filosofii and by representatives of the research project No. 24-18-00651, “The Ontology of the Nation in Rus­sian Neo-Kantianism”, carried out at the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Uni­versity and supported by the Russian Science Foundation. Leading domestic philosophers-epistemologists, political scientists, ethnographers, historians of philosophy, and young researchers of Russian Neo-Kantianism took part in the discussion. At the center of their attention was one of the most important global issues – national identity, which has gained particular urgency in the first quarter of the 21st century, as evidenced by current political and social processes surrounding us (migration, interethnic conflicts, the rise of national chauvinism, the disappearance of peoples and languages, etc.). Participants were invited to examine the issues of nation-building from within the Russian philosophical tradition, in the context of debates on the uniqueness and self-identification of Russia. These debates have become a constitutive backbone and conceptual core of Russian philosophy, acquiring not so much a pragmatic as a cultural-his­torical significance. Speakers focused on the historical transformations of the concepts of “narodnost”, “nation”, and “ethnos”, and examined possible configu­rations of national identity formation in various cultures. Special attention was also given to interpretations of the “nation” in the socio-philosophical and philo­sophical-methodological concepts of Russian Neo-Kantians such as V.M. Khvos­tov, P.I. Novgorodtsev, A.L. Sakketti, and M.M. Rubinstein.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voprosy filosofii
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-8-5-37
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Debates on Narodnost in Russian Intellectual Culture: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (“Round Table” Materials)

Irina О. Shchedrina, T. Shchedrina, Р. Р. Вахитов, Valery Tishkov et al.
Voprosy filosofii
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
article

Debates on Narodnost in Russian Intellectual Culture: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (“Round Table” Materials)

Irina О. Shchedrina, T. Shchedrina, Р. Р. Вахитов, Valery Tishkov, Nina Dmitrieva, Mikhail Yu. Zagirnyak, Leonid Yu. Kornilaev, Andrey Teslya, Boris V. Mezhuev, Boris I. Pruzhinin, Sergey A. Nickolsky, Yuri Granin, Maria A. Roschepkina
article en

Abstract

In November 2024, a “round-table” was held on the topic: “Debates on Narod­nost in Russian Intellectual Culture: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow”. The discus­sion was initiated by the journal Voprosy Filosofii and by representatives of the research project No. 24-18-00651, “The Ontology of the Nation in Rus­sian Neo-Kantianism”, carried out at the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Uni­versity and supported by the Russian Science Foundation. Leading domestic philosophers-epistemologists, political scientists, ethnographers, historians of philosophy, and young researchers of Russian Neo-Kantianism took part in the discussion. At the center of their attention was one of the most important global issues – national identity, which has gained particular urgency in the first quarter of the 21st century, as evidenced by current political and social processes surrounding us (migration, interethnic conflicts, the rise of national chauvinism, the disappearance of peoples and languages, etc.). Participants were invited to examine the issues of nation-building from within the Russian philosophical tradition, in the context of debates on the uniqueness and self-identification of Russia. These debates have become a constitutive backbone and conceptual core of Russian philosophy, acquiring not so much a pragmatic as a cultural-his­torical significance. Speakers focused on the historical transformations of the concepts of “narodnost”, “nation”, and “ethnos”, and examined possible configu­rations of national identity formation in various cultures. Special attention was also given to interpretations of the “nation” in the socio-philosophical and philo­sophical-methodological concepts of Russian Neo-Kantians such as V.M. Khvos­tov, P.I. Novgorodtsev, A.L. Sakketti, and M.M. Rubinstein.

Voprosy filosofii(8)
University of Science and Technology (YE), Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University (RU), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Institute of Anthropology and Ethnography (RU), Moscow State University (TJ), Korea University of Science and Technology (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.