FAIRness and data quality assessment of urban air quality monitoring datasets: Perspective on insights from F-UJI evaluation

Advancements in information technology have supported the open availability of environmental monitoring datasets to aid global initiatives such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). Despite these efforts, challenges concerning data quality and adherence to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles continue to restrict the effective reuse of such datasets, particularly for secondary applications. This study uses the F-UJI assessment tool and a set of eight established DQ dimensions to evaluate the FAIRness and Data Quality (DQ) of four publicly available urban air quality monitoring datasets from international agencies. Each dataset was assessed against 17 FAIR metrics and scored accordingly. The FAIR assessments revealed moderate to low levels of compliance across datasets, with Reusable scores ranging from 2 to 3 out of 10, and Interoperability often being the weakest dimension. DQ analysis showed recurring issues in consistency, completeness, interpretability, and traceability, particularly where metadata was poorly structured or lacked semantic depth. While the scope is limited to four datasets, the results highlight common structural and semantic deficiencies hindering data reuse. Based on these findings, the study offers targeted recommendations to support improved metadata practices and better alignment with FAIR principles within the air quality monitoring subdomain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data in Brief
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2025.112071
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FAIRness and data quality assessment of urban air quality monitoring datasets: Perspective on insights from F-UJI evaluation

Moazzam Shah Bukhari Syed, Damon Berry, Paula Kelly, Paul Stacey
Data in Brief
Data Quality and Management
article

FAIRness and data quality assessment of urban air quality monitoring datasets: Perspective on insights from F-UJI evaluation

Moazzam Shah Bukhari Syed, Damon Berry, Paula Kelly, Paul Stacey
article en

Abstract

Advancements in information technology have supported the open availability of environmental monitoring datasets to aid global initiatives such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). Despite these efforts, challenges concerning data quality and adherence to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles continue to restrict the effective reuse of such datasets, particularly for secondary applications. This study uses the F-UJI assessment tool and a set of eight established DQ dimensions to evaluate the FAIRness and Data Quality (DQ) of four publicly available urban air quality monitoring datasets from international agencies. Each dataset was assessed against 17 FAIR metrics and scored accordingly. The FAIR assessments revealed moderate to low levels of compliance across datasets, with Reusable scores ranging from 2 to 3 out of 10, and Interoperability often being the weakest dimension. DQ analysis showed recurring issues in consistency, completeness, interpretability, and traceability, particularly where metadata was poorly structured or lacked semantic depth. While the scope is limited to four datasets, the results highlight common structural and semantic deficiencies hindering data reuse. Based on these findings, the study offers targeted recommendations to support improved metadata practices and better alignment with FAIR principles within the air quality monitoring subdomain.

Data in BriefVol. 62
University College Cork (IE), Technological University Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.