Problems in designing air domes: a lesson from a construction disaster

Modern roofs for tennis courts, swimming pools, or playing fields can take various forms, but an increasingly popular design choice is pneumatic structures. These structures are supported by maintaining a higher internal pressure that upholds the membrane, achieved through a continuous air-blowing system. The difference between the pressure of the hall’s interior and atmospheric pressure ranges from 2.5 to 3.5 hPa. In practical terms, this means that the pressure on the air-supported dome is 25–35 kg/m2. Although these structures have been in operation in Europe for several decades, there are still reports of construction disasters of this type of facility. This article presents a case study of one such disaster, including material tests of the membrane, the analysis of technical documentation, and a discussion of recommendations and standard provisions. While determining the causes of the incident, it was shown that excessive snow load was the main cause of the disaster, and the lack of adequate legal regulations still has negative consequences affecting the safety of using air domes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Civil Engineering
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2025.155118
Primary Topic
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problems in designing air domes: a lesson from a construction disaster

Jakub Zając, Łukasz Drobiec, Krzysztof Grzyb, Olgierd Donajko
Archives of Civil Engineering
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
article

Problems in designing air domes: a lesson from a construction disaster

Jakub Zając, Łukasz Drobiec, Krzysztof Grzyb, Olgierd Donajko
article en

Abstract

Modern roofs for tennis courts, swimming pools, or playing fields can take various forms, but an increasingly popular design choice is pneumatic structures. These structures are supported by maintaining a higher internal pressure that upholds the membrane, achieved through a continuous air-blowing system. The difference between the pressure of the hall’s interior and atmospheric pressure ranges from 2.5 to 3.5 hPa. In practical terms, this means that the pressure on the air-supported dome is 25–35 kg/m2. Although these structures have been in operation in Europe for several decades, there are still reports of construction disasters of this type of facility. This article presents a case study of one such disaster, including material tests of the membrane, the analysis of technical documentation, and a discussion of recommendations and standard provisions. While determining the causes of the incident, it was shown that excessive snow load was the main cause of the disaster, and the lack of adequate legal regulations still has negative consequences affecting the safety of using air domes.

Archives of Civil Engineering
Silesian University of Technology (PL), Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Problems in designing air domes: a lesson from a construction disaster — Jakub Zając, Łukasz Drobiec, et al. · Archives of Civil Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS