The politics of protection: regulatory responses to COVID-19 in the meatpacking sector

ABSTRACT During COVID-19, U.S. meatpacking plants were deemed “essential critical infrastructure” under the Defense Production Act of 1950. Workers’ health suffered, due to intersecting variables, including company negligence, limited state intervention, and pre-existing issues associated with corporate consolidation and production. We examine the political-economic roots of harms experienced by meatpacking workers during the pandemic. What institutional, structural, and sociopolitical factors shaped federal meatpacking policymaking and regulatory oversight during COVID-19? Drawing on interview data, content analysis, and critical policy ethnography, we assess intersections between state-facilitated corporate crime and the influence of agribusiness on policymaking processes. We explore barriers that bureaucrats and officials faced in creating and enforcing worker protections during the pandemic, including limited resources, political pressure, and dominant neoliberal norms that prioritized economic growth over regulation. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of how mechanisms related to state policy, corporate practices, and regulatory enforcement structured state-facilitated corporate crime and subsequent harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Problems
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spaf051
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of protection: regulatory responses to COVID-19 in the meatpacking sector

Stephanie A. Malin, India Luxton
2 citations
Social Problems
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
4.63
article

The politics of protection: regulatory responses to COVID-19 in the meatpacking sector

Stephanie A. Malin, India Luxton
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT During COVID-19, U.S. meatpacking plants were deemed “essential critical infrastructure” under the Defense Production Act of 1950. Workers’ health suffered, due to intersecting variables, including company negligence, limited state intervention, and pre-existing issues associated with corporate consolidation and production. We examine the political-economic roots of harms experienced by meatpacking workers during the pandemic. What institutional, structural, and sociopolitical factors shaped federal meatpacking policymaking and regulatory oversight during COVID-19? Drawing on interview data, content analysis, and critical policy ethnography, we assess intersections between state-facilitated corporate crime and the influence of agribusiness on policymaking processes. We explore barriers that bureaucrats and officials faced in creating and enforcing worker protections during the pandemic, including limited resources, political pressure, and dominant neoliberal norms that prioritized economic growth over regulation. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of how mechanisms related to state policy, corporate practices, and regulatory enforcement structured state-facilitated corporate crime and subsequent harm.

Social Problems
Meridian Institute (US), Syracuse University (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
4.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.