The impact of thermal and auditory unpleasant stimulus on explicit motor imagery in healthy individuals: An experimental study

Motor imagery is the ability to mentally simulate a motor task without actually performing it. Furthermore, pain is an unpleasant sensory experience that involves different dimensions - sensory-discriminative, motivational-affective, and cognitive-evaluative - that are known to interfere with motor imagery. However, it remains unclear which specific pain dimension most significantly impairs motor imagery vividness. This study aims to compare the effects of unpleasant auditory (primarily affective and cognitive) and thermal (primarily sensory) stimuli, which can be assimilated to pain, on discrete and continuous explicit motor imagery sessions. Eighteen healthy participants were exposed to these unpleasant stimuli in addition to a control condition. Participants rated the vividness of their explicit motor imagery after performing full back-and-forth flexion and extension of their wrists in discrete and continuous sessions. Results showed that during discrete explicit motor imagery, only the aversive auditory stimulus significantly reduced motor imagery vividness, whereas thermal pain had no effect. In contrast, motor imagery vividness was preserved during the continuous session. These findings suggest that explicit motor imagery may be more affected by the affective dimension of pain induced by aversive auditory stimuli. The preservation of motor imagery vividness in the continuous session provides insight into the optimization of rehabilitation programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321343
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of thermal and auditory unpleasant stimulus on explicit motor imagery in healthy individuals: An experimental study

Arnaud Dupeyron, Denis Mottet, Gabriel Cohen-Aknine, Raphaël Pionnier
PLoS ONE
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

The impact of thermal and auditory unpleasant stimulus on explicit motor imagery in healthy individuals: An experimental study

Arnaud Dupeyron, Denis Mottet, Gabriel Cohen-Aknine, Raphaël Pionnier
article en

Abstract

Motor imagery is the ability to mentally simulate a motor task without actually performing it. Furthermore, pain is an unpleasant sensory experience that involves different dimensions - sensory-discriminative, motivational-affective, and cognitive-evaluative - that are known to interfere with motor imagery. However, it remains unclear which specific pain dimension most significantly impairs motor imagery vividness. This study aims to compare the effects of unpleasant auditory (primarily affective and cognitive) and thermal (primarily sensory) stimuli, which can be assimilated to pain, on discrete and continuous explicit motor imagery sessions. Eighteen healthy participants were exposed to these unpleasant stimuli in addition to a control condition. Participants rated the vividness of their explicit motor imagery after performing full back-and-forth flexion and extension of their wrists in discrete and continuous sessions. Results showed that during discrete explicit motor imagery, only the aversive auditory stimulus significantly reduced motor imagery vividness, whereas thermal pain had no effect. In contrast, motor imagery vividness was preserved during the continuous session. These findings suggest that explicit motor imagery may be more affected by the affective dimension of pain induced by aversive auditory stimuli. The preservation of motor imagery vividness in the continuous session provides insight into the optimization of rehabilitation programs.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(9)
Université de Montpellier (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (FR), IMT Mines Alès (FR), Université de Nîmes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.