Experimental and numerical assessment of optimized hybrid strengthening techniques for unreinforced masonry columns under axial compression

This study presents a comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation into the axial performance of unreinforced masonry (URM) columns strengthened with various hybrid retrofitting techniques. Thirteen full-scale brick masonry columns were tested under monotonic axial compression to evaluate the effects of strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) jacketing, near-surface mounted (NSM) steel bars, and embedded steel/glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) mesh. The experimental program examined load–displacement behavior, failure modes, ultimate capacity, ductility, and energy absorption. Results demonstrated that hybrid strengthening combining NSM bars and mesh-reinforced SHCC jacketing achieved up to 70 % increase in load capacity and double the energy absorption compared to the unstrengthened reference. A validated finite element model, developed in ABAQUS using cohesive damage and embedded interaction approaches, accurately replicated the experimental response, with an average experimental-to-numerical load ratio of 0.95 and displacement ratio of 0.90. Parametric studies showed that increasing longitudinal reinforcement ratio in hybrid systems enhanced axial capacity by up to 39 %, while increasing transverse mesh ratio improved strength by 25 % before plateauing. These findings highlight the synergistic role of axial and transverse reinforcement in improving strength and ductility and offer a reliable modeling framework for optimizing retrofit designs of URM columns in seismic and structural upgrade applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structures
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110222
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental and numerical assessment of optimized hybrid strengthening techniques for unreinforced masonry columns under axial compression

Galal Elsamak, Mohamed H. El-Naqeeb, Mohamed Emara, Ehab A. Mlybari et al.
8 citations
Structures
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
7.63
article

Experimental and numerical assessment of optimized hybrid strengthening techniques for unreinforced masonry columns under axial compression

Galal Elsamak, Mohamed H. El-Naqeeb, Mohamed Emara, Ehab A. Mlybari, Mohamed Ghalla, Rabeea W. Bazuhair
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation into the axial performance of unreinforced masonry (URM) columns strengthened with various hybrid retrofitting techniques. Thirteen full-scale brick masonry columns were tested under monotonic axial compression to evaluate the effects of strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) jacketing, near-surface mounted (NSM) steel bars, and embedded steel/glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) mesh. The experimental program examined load–displacement behavior, failure modes, ultimate capacity, ductility, and energy absorption. Results demonstrated that hybrid strengthening combining NSM bars and mesh-reinforced SHCC jacketing achieved up to 70 % increase in load capacity and double the energy absorption compared to the unstrengthened reference. A validated finite element model, developed in ABAQUS using cohesive damage and embedded interaction approaches, accurately replicated the experimental response, with an average experimental-to-numerical load ratio of 0.95 and displacement ratio of 0.90. Parametric studies showed that increasing longitudinal reinforcement ratio in hybrid systems enhanced axial capacity by up to 39 %, while increasing transverse mesh ratio improved strength by 25 % before plateauing. These findings highlight the synergistic role of axial and transverse reinforcement in improving strength and ductility and offer a reliable modeling framework for optimizing retrofit designs of URM columns in seismic and structural upgrade applications.

StructuresVol. 81
Kafrelsheikh University (EG), University of South Australia (AU), Zagazig University (EG), Umm al-Qura University (SA), Badr University in Cairo (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
7.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.