An exploratory pilot study of mathematics performance patterns: visual art students vs. non-art students

This is an exploratory pilot study designed to identify preliminary patterns in mathematics performance. A longitudinal comparative design was adopted, analyzing mathematics scores of 37 art students and 40 non-art students from a Chinese university across four consecutive semesters. Descriptive statistics characterized overall performance, independent samples <i>t</i>-tests (with Bonferroni correction) assessed between-group differences per semester, Pearson correlation coefficients examined intra-individual score consistency, ANCOVA (with gender as a covariate) and subgroup analyses explored gender effects, and trend analysis tracked longitudinal changes. <i>Post-hoc</i> power analysis confirmed sufficient power (0.809-0.899) to detect moderate effects. Non-art students demonstrated consistently higher numerical mathematics scores than art students across all semesters (75.6-78.9 vs. 70.2-73.5). After Bonferroni correction (α = 0.0125), <i>t</i>-tests confirmed statistically significant differences only in Semester 3 (<i>t</i> = -2.43, <i>p</i> = 0.017). Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-tests were applied to validate <i>t</i>-test results for Semester 2 (mixed normality) and Semester 3 (non-normal data), confirming the Semester 3 significance (<i>U</i> = 393.5, <i>p</i> = 0.000) and consistency of non-significant findings in Semester 2. Gender subgroup analyses revealed the gap was driven exclusively by female students (non-art: <i>M</i> = 81.12 vs. art: <i>M</i> = 74.56, <i>p</i> = 0.006), while males showed no differences (<i>p</i> = 0.963). Correlation analysis revealed stronger score stability among non-art students (<i>r</i> = 0.62-0.78) compared to art students (<i>r</i> = 0.51-0.65). Both groups showed a gradual upward trend (art: +3.3 points; non-art: +3.3 points), but the numerical performance gap remained stable (5.2-5.4 points). Preliminary patterns of persistent mathematics performance differences highlight the need for targeted support to balance artistic and academic development for art majors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1676916
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An exploratory pilot study of mathematics performance patterns: visual art students vs. non-art students

Yu Cao
Frontiers in Psychology
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

An exploratory pilot study of mathematics performance patterns: visual art students vs. non-art students

Yu Cao
article en

Abstract

This is an exploratory pilot study designed to identify preliminary patterns in mathematics performance. A longitudinal comparative design was adopted, analyzing mathematics scores of 37 art students and 40 non-art students from a Chinese university across four consecutive semesters. Descriptive statistics characterized overall performance, independent samples <i>t</i>-tests (with Bonferroni correction) assessed between-group differences per semester, Pearson correlation coefficients examined intra-individual score consistency, ANCOVA (with gender as a covariate) and subgroup analyses explored gender effects, and trend analysis tracked longitudinal changes. <i>Post-hoc</i> power analysis confirmed sufficient power (0.809-0.899) to detect moderate effects. Non-art students demonstrated consistently higher numerical mathematics scores than art students across all semesters (75.6-78.9 vs. 70.2-73.5). After Bonferroni correction (α = 0.0125), <i>t</i>-tests confirmed statistically significant differences only in Semester 3 (<i>t</i> = -2.43, <i>p</i> = 0.017). Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-tests were applied to validate <i>t</i>-test results for Semester 2 (mixed normality) and Semester 3 (non-normal data), confirming the Semester 3 significance (<i>U</i> = 393.5, <i>p</i> = 0.000) and consistency of non-significant findings in Semester 2. Gender subgroup analyses revealed the gap was driven exclusively by female students (non-art: <i>M</i> = 81.12 vs. art: <i>M</i> = 74.56, <i>p</i> = 0.006), while males showed no differences (<i>p</i> = 0.963). Correlation analysis revealed stronger score stability among non-art students (<i>r</i> = 0.62-0.78) compared to art students (<i>r</i> = 0.51-0.65). Both groups showed a gradual upward trend (art: +3.3 points; non-art: +3.3 points), but the numerical performance gap remained stable (5.2-5.4 points). Preliminary patterns of persistent mathematics performance differences highlight the need for targeted support to balance artistic and academic development for art majors.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
Shandong Management University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An exploratory pilot study of mathematics performance patterns: visual art students vs. non-art students — Yu Cao · Frontiers in Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS