Growing and pruning the archive: an agent-based model to build letter correspondence networks

Abstract The selection and availability bias concerning digital archives can be a problem for empirical studies. In the context of historical correspondence networks, we still have limited information about how missing data can affect and hinder the variables of our interest. Along these lines, we introduce an agent-based model to reconstruct historical communication using letters. We use this model to simulate the letter-sending process and its subsequent archival. We use it to build counterfactual networks and learn how the missing data caused by the archival of the letters might bias the network statistics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf081
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wikis in Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Growing and pruning the archive: an agent-based model to build letter correspondence networks

Bernardo Buarque, Aleksandra Kaye, Malte Vogl
1 citations
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Wikis in Education and Collaboration
3.86
article

Growing and pruning the archive: an agent-based model to build letter correspondence networks

Bernardo Buarque, Aleksandra Kaye, Malte Vogl
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The selection and availability bias concerning digital archives can be a problem for empirical studies. In the context of historical correspondence networks, we still have limited information about how missing data can affect and hinder the variables of our interest. Along these lines, we introduce an agent-based model to reconstruct historical communication using letters. We use this model to simulate the letter-sending process and its subsequent archival. We use it to build counterfactual networks and learn how the missing data caused by the archival of the letters might bias the network statistics.

Digital Scholarship in the HumanitiesVol. 40(4)
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (DE), Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Wikis in Education and Collaboration
3.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.