Ventricular tachycardia substrate mapping with cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Head-to-head comparison of two clinically available postprocessing platforms
ADAS 3D and inHEART demonstrated high concordance in scar quantification and substrate characterization, with comparable performance across cardiomyopathy types. Given their complementary strengths, platform choice should be guided by procedural goals, imaging availability, operator experience, and institutional context, as each system offers distinct advantages. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact on procedural success and long-term outcomes.
Authors
- Luuk H G A Hopman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3896-9920)
- Cornelis P. Allaart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0506-9512)
- Pieter G. Postema (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2863-9159)
- Michiel J. B. Kemme (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3671-5660)
- D C van der Laan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5889-3751)
- Marco Götte (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9713-3675)
- Bruno Soré
- Pranav Bhagirath (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3732-9304)
- R. Ventura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5980-2508)
Institutions
- King's College London (GB)
- Groupe de Recherche en Économie Théorique et Appliquée (FR)
- FC Barcelona (ES)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Heart Rhythm
- Published
- 2025-09-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.028
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.16
Funders
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- King's College London
- Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers
- Netherlands Heart Institute