Surface roughness and dimensional accuracy of titanium overhanging thin-walls via laser powder bed fusion

Laser Powder Bed Fusion offers a promising solution for enabling customized products such as implants with more precision and efficiency. Over 10% of titanium implants for joint replacement cause bone destruction due to incompatibility in mechanical design and improper surface matching. The strategy to overcome these issues involves developing specific surface features, such as overhanging walls, to enhance the bone-implant interface. Such features often require support-free fabrication due to the risk of compromising the integrity of thin-walled features during supports removal. Hence manufacturing of titanium overhanging thin-walls, such a critical element in implants, with proper topology and precision requires knowledge of the correct strategy and processing parameters. However, a critical gap remains in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion production and surface characterization of these structures. The purpose of this study is the evaluation of the feasibility of producing unsupported inclined thin-walls using this additive manufacturing technology and assessing the associated surface quality and topology. Here overhanging thin-walls were successfully manufactured with angles closely matching the references (30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°). Dimensional accuracy and roughness of the walls were assessed for both upskin and downskin surfaces. Higher thicknesses than in designed version were observed for all groups, particularly elevated for 30° overhanging angle, also showing the highest roughness for both upskin and downskin sides. Despite the larger thickness, overhanging angles the 45° and 60° led to the lowest roughness values. • Measured angles closely aligned with expected values. • Total thickness obtained higher than CAD (200 μm) ranging from 430 to 526 μm. • Powder agglomeration depends on inclination with opposite trend on up and downskin. • Lower surface roughness values for all upskin comparing to downskin. • Highest surface roughness at 30° (Sa = 25 μm); lowest at 45° and 60° (Sa = 15 μm).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.09.037
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surface roughness and dimensional accuracy of titanium overhanging thin-walls via laser powder bed fusion

Michael I. Gasik, G. Miranda, F. Bartolomeu, F.S. Silva et al.
3 citations
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
2.14
article

Surface roughness and dimensional accuracy of titanium overhanging thin-walls via laser powder bed fusion

Michael I. Gasik, G. Miranda, F. Bartolomeu, F.S. Silva, Josilainne Marcelino Dias
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Laser Powder Bed Fusion offers a promising solution for enabling customized products such as implants with more precision and efficiency. Over 10% of titanium implants for joint replacement cause bone destruction due to incompatibility in mechanical design and improper surface matching. The strategy to overcome these issues involves developing specific surface features, such as overhanging walls, to enhance the bone-implant interface. Such features often require support-free fabrication due to the risk of compromising the integrity of thin-walled features during supports removal. Hence manufacturing of titanium overhanging thin-walls, such a critical element in implants, with proper topology and precision requires knowledge of the correct strategy and processing parameters. However, a critical gap remains in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion production and surface characterization of these structures. The purpose of this study is the evaluation of the feasibility of producing unsupported inclined thin-walls using this additive manufacturing technology and assessing the associated surface quality and topology. Here overhanging thin-walls were successfully manufactured with angles closely matching the references (30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°). Dimensional accuracy and roughness of the walls were assessed for both upskin and downskin surfaces. Higher thicknesses than in designed version were observed for all groups, particularly elevated for 30° overhanging angle, also showing the highest roughness for both upskin and downskin sides. Despite the larger thickness, overhanging angles the 45° and 60° led to the lowest roughness values. • Measured angles closely aligned with expected values. • Total thickness obtained higher than CAD (200 μm) ranging from 430 to 526 μm. • Powder agglomeration depends on inclination with opposite trend on up and downskin. • Lower surface roughness values for all upskin comparing to downskin. • Highest surface roughness at 30° (Sa = 25 μm); lowest at 45° and 60° (Sa = 15 μm).

Journal of Manufacturing ProcessesVol. 153
Technology Innovation Institute (AE), University of Aveiro (PT), Aalto University (FI), University of Minho (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.