Grieving the Multiple Losses of LGBTIQ+ Breakups

This article addresses a topic seldom discussed in public or academic research: grief following breakups among LGBTIQ+ people. By attuning its analysis to queer grief as it is sensed, lived, and entangled within multiple grief assemblages, this article moves beyond prevailing frameworks for understanding LGBTIQ+ breakups, which often take structural and legal problems as their starting point. It advances and develops an affect-theoretical approach to grief in the context of LGBTIQ+ relationship breakups. Highlighting the multiplicity of queer grief assemblages, the article demonstrates how various elements – human, nonhuman, psychic, cultural, and spatial – are entangled in these assemblages, alleviating and complicating the grieving process. The analysis draws on thirty interviews with Finnish LGBTIQ+ people who have experienced relationship breakups. Employing Deleuzian research methodologies, the study seeks to identify the elements and relations within queer grief assemblages through which flows, blockages and accumulations of grief emerge. In these assemblages, affective intensities often condense around grief for the loss of a partner; however, the assemblages always extend beyond to encompass other people as well as ideological, spatial, material and psychic elements. Rather than contributing to the most intense affective peaks within the grief assemblages, heteronormative elements often grief, either by entangling painful past experiences that puncture the flow of grief in the present or by preventing grief assemblages from extending beyond the personal and private into the public sphere.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
lambda nordica
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34041/ln.v30.1021
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grieving the Multiple Losses of LGBTIQ+ Breakups

Annukka Lahti
lambda nordica
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Grieving the Multiple Losses of LGBTIQ+ Breakups

Annukka Lahti
article en

Abstract

This article addresses a topic seldom discussed in public or academic research: grief following breakups among LGBTIQ+ people. By attuning its analysis to queer grief as it is sensed, lived, and entangled within multiple grief assemblages, this article moves beyond prevailing frameworks for understanding LGBTIQ+ breakups, which often take structural and legal problems as their starting point. It advances and develops an affect-theoretical approach to grief in the context of LGBTIQ+ relationship breakups. Highlighting the multiplicity of queer grief assemblages, the article demonstrates how various elements – human, nonhuman, psychic, cultural, and spatial – are entangled in these assemblages, alleviating and complicating the grieving process. The analysis draws on thirty interviews with Finnish LGBTIQ+ people who have experienced relationship breakups. Employing Deleuzian research methodologies, the study seeks to identify the elements and relations within queer grief assemblages through which flows, blockages and accumulations of grief emerge. In these assemblages, affective intensities often condense around grief for the loss of a partner; however, the assemblages always extend beyond to encompass other people as well as ideological, spatial, material and psychic elements. Rather than contributing to the most intense affective peaks within the grief assemblages, heteronormative elements often grief, either by entangling painful past experiences that puncture the flow of grief in the present or by preventing grief assemblages from extending beyond the personal and private into the public sphere.

lambda nordicaVol. 30(2)
Itä-Suomen Yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.