Nonexercise Estimation of VO<sub>2</sub>peak Using Seismocardiography in Female Subelite and Male Elite Football Players

A novel method for estimating V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak using seismocardiography (SCG eV̇O<sub>2</sub>peak) at rest was developed some years ago, and this study investigates an updated version using data from a trained population. Forty five subelite female and Sixty seven elite male football players were tested and included in a cross-sectional accuracy comparison between SCG eV̇O<sub>2</sub>peak and V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak obtained from an incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) performed on a treadmill. In addition, the ability of the method to detect changes over time was assessed by comparison of changes in V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak over 3 months (female and male, n = 60), 6 months (female, n = 17), and 1 year (male, n = 18) for CPET and SCG, respectively. No difference and a fair agreement were found between combined sex cross-sectional SCG eV̇O<sub>2</sub>peak and CPET V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak (bias ± 95% CI: -1.0 ± 0.9 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup> and limits of agreement [95%]: ± 9.1 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup>), with similar agreement between sexes. The standard error of estimation and mean absolute percentage error were 4.8 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup> and 7.4%, respectively. V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak was only increased over 6 months for females (CPET: 2.2 ± 1.1 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup>, SCG: 1.2 ± 1.1 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup>, and p < 0.05) with no difference between methods (p = 0.170). A correlation between ΔV̇O<sub>2</sub>peak for CPET and SCG was found for 1-year analyses (male, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.62, and P < 0.05) but no other correlations were significant. The SCG method is accurate in estimating V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak in both subelite and elite football players, with fair agreement and low estimation errors. The SCG method was able to detect an association of 1-year changes but not for changes over shorter times; however, these results require more investigation due to small sample sizes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Sport Science
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.70047
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonexercise Estimation of VO2peak Using Seismocardiography in Female Subelite and Male Elite Football Players

Tue Rømer, Mikkel Thunestvedt Hansen, Malte Nejst Larsen, Axel Illeris Poggi et al.
European Journal of Sport Science
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
article

Nonexercise Estimation of VO2peak Using Seismocardiography in Female Subelite and Male Elite Football Players

Tue Rømer, Mikkel Thunestvedt Hansen, Malte Nejst Larsen, Axel Illeris Poggi, Bo Bernhard Nielsen, Peter Krustrup, Paweł Chmura, Ronni Eg Sahl, Jørn Wulff Helge, Kristine Kjær Lange, Kristoffer Furbo, Jennie Brask Augsburg
article en

Abstract

A novel method for estimating V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak using seismocardiography (SCG eV̇O<sub>2</sub>peak) at rest was developed some years ago, and this study investigates an updated version using data from a trained population. Forty five subelite female and Sixty seven elite male football players were tested and included in a cross-sectional accuracy comparison between SCG eV̇O<sub>2</sub>peak and V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak obtained from an incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) performed on a treadmill. In addition, the ability of the method to detect changes over time was assessed by comparison of changes in V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak over 3 months (female and male, n = 60), 6 months (female, n = 17), and 1 year (male, n = 18) for CPET and SCG, respectively. No difference and a fair agreement were found between combined sex cross-sectional SCG eV̇O<sub>2</sub>peak and CPET V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak (bias ± 95% CI: -1.0 ± 0.9 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup> and limits of agreement [95%]: ± 9.1 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup>), with similar agreement between sexes. The standard error of estimation and mean absolute percentage error were 4.8 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup> and 7.4%, respectively. V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak was only increased over 6 months for females (CPET: 2.2 ± 1.1 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup>, SCG: 1.2 ± 1.1 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup>, and p < 0.05) with no difference between methods (p = 0.170). A correlation between ΔV̇O<sub>2</sub>peak for CPET and SCG was found for 1-year analyses (male, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.62, and P < 0.05) but no other correlations were significant. The SCG method is accurate in estimating V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak in both subelite and elite football players, with fair agreement and low estimation errors. The SCG method was able to detect an association of 1-year changes but not for changes over shorter times; however, these results require more investigation due to small sample sizes.

European Journal of Sport ScienceVol. 25(10)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Steno Diabetes Centers (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK), Odense Municipality (DK), Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences (PL)
Novo Nordisk, Novo Nordisk Fonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.