Emergency Action Plan Adoption Across Athletic Training Practice Settings

ABSTRACT Context: The 2024 NATA Position Statement provides updated recommendations for EAP adoption. Past research on the 2002 statement showed limited adoption by ATs. Assessing current adoption across practice settings offers a clearer picture of the EAP implementation landscape. Objectives: To examine ATs' adoption of new EAP best-practice recommendations across practice settings. Design: Cross-Sectional study. Setting: Online questionnaire. Patients or Other Participants: Clinically active ATs (n=614) working in any practice setting (Youth, Secondary School, Division 1 Power 4, Collegiate athletics – Not Power 4, Non-Major Professional Sports, Professional Sports, Non-Sideline). Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence of an EAP, adoption of recommendations, and emergency equipment across practice settings. Median values are reported for aggregate data. Results: Most ATs (n=582, 94.8%) reported having an EAP, with the highest adoption among ATs practicing in the secondary school setting (n=369, 97.6%) and the lowest adoption among those working in non-sideline settings (n=27, 84.4%). On average, ATs adopted 16±7.5 (median: 18) out of 26 recommendations, with the lowest level of adoption among ATs working in the youth sports (9.5±7.9; median: 7) and the highest level of adoption among those working in the professional sports (18±9; median: 22). Bleeding control materials (n=483, 78.7%; range: 73.6%-94.7%) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation masks (n=476, 77.5%; range: 67.8%-94.7%) were the most prevalent emergency equipment available. Bronchodilators (n=108, 17.6%; range: 3.8%-47.4%) and supplemental oxygen (n=124, 20.2%; range: 3.8%-73.7%) were the least prevalent available equipment. Conclusions: Most ATs reported having an EAP, but fewer than 15% adopted all 2024 recommendations. These findings provide a baseline to assess setting-specific adoption and guide resource development. Emergency equipment availability varied, highlighting the need for ATs to ensure access to setting-specific emergency tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Athletic Training
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0255.25
Primary Topic
Athletic Training and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergency Action Plan Adoption Across Athletic Training Practice Settings

Zachary K. Winkelmann, Rebecca M. Hirschhorn, Samantha E. Scarneo‐Miller, Rebecca L. Stearns et al.
Journal of Athletic Training
Athletic Training and Education
article

Emergency Action Plan Adoption Across Athletic Training Practice Settings

Zachary K. Winkelmann, Rebecca M. Hirschhorn, Samantha E. Scarneo‐Miller, Rebecca L. Stearns, Alicia M. Pike Lacy, Rebecca M. Lopez, Susan W. Yeargin, Christianne M. Eason
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Context: The 2024 NATA Position Statement provides updated recommendations for EAP adoption. Past research on the 2002 statement showed limited adoption by ATs. Assessing current adoption across practice settings offers a clearer picture of the EAP implementation landscape. Objectives: To examine ATs' adoption of new EAP best-practice recommendations across practice settings. Design: Cross-Sectional study. Setting: Online questionnaire. Patients or Other Participants: Clinically active ATs (n=614) working in any practice setting (Youth, Secondary School, Division 1 Power 4, Collegiate athletics – Not Power 4, Non-Major Professional Sports, Professional Sports, Non-Sideline). Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence of an EAP, adoption of recommendations, and emergency equipment across practice settings. Median values are reported for aggregate data. Results: Most ATs (n=582, 94.8%) reported having an EAP, with the highest adoption among ATs practicing in the secondary school setting (n=369, 97.6%) and the lowest adoption among those working in non-sideline settings (n=27, 84.4%). On average, ATs adopted 16±7.5 (median: 18) out of 26 recommendations, with the lowest level of adoption among ATs working in the youth sports (9.5±7.9; median: 7) and the highest level of adoption among those working in the professional sports (18±9; median: 22). Bleeding control materials (n=483, 78.7%; range: 73.6%-94.7%) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation masks (n=476, 77.5%; range: 67.8%-94.7%) were the most prevalent emergency equipment available. Bronchodilators (n=108, 17.6%; range: 3.8%-47.4%) and supplemental oxygen (n=124, 20.2%; range: 3.8%-73.7%) were the least prevalent available equipment. Conclusions: Most ATs reported having an EAP, but fewer than 15% adopted all 2024 recommendations. These findings provide a baseline to assess setting-specific adoption and guide resource development. Emergency equipment availability varied, highlighting the need for ATs to ensure access to setting-specific emergency tools.

Journal of Athletic Training
Zabol University (IR), University of Alicante (ES), Gleason (United States) (US), Bee Research Institute (CZ), Özyeğin University (TR), Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US), University of South Florida St. Petersburg (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Athletic Training and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.