What falls versus what we recover: Quantifying search and recovery bias for orbital meteorites

Abstract Instrumentally determined pre‐atmospheric orbits of meteorites offer crucial constraints on the provenance of extraterrestrial material and the dynamical pathways that deliver it to Earth. However, recovery efforts are focused on larger and slower impacts due to their higher survival probabilities and ease of detection. In this study, we investigate the prevalence of these biases in the population of recovered meteorites with known orbits. We compiled a data set of 75 meteorites with triangulated trajectories and compared their orbits to 538 potential 1 g meteorite‐dropping fireballs detected by the Global Fireball Observatory, the European Fireball Network, and the Fireball Recovery and InterPlanetary Observation Network. Our results reveal that objects with small semi‐major axis values (a1.8 au) appear 2–3 more often than expected. The current sample of meteorites with known orbits does not reflect the sources of meteorites in our collections, and it is essential to account for search and recovery biases to obtain a more representative understanding of meteorite source contributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meteoritics and Planetary Science
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.70041
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What falls versus what we recover: Quantifying search and recovery bias for orbital meteorites

Eleanor K. Sansom, Jérémie Vaubaillon, Patrick Shober, Sophie Deam et al.
2 citations
Meteoritics and Planetary Science
Astro and Planetary Science
2.31
article

What falls versus what we recover: Quantifying search and recovery bias for orbital meteorites

Eleanor K. Sansom, Jérémie Vaubaillon, Patrick Shober, Sophie Deam, Pierre Vernazza, B. Zanda, Simon Anghel, Hadrien A. R. Devillepoix, F. Colas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Instrumentally determined pre‐atmospheric orbits of meteorites offer crucial constraints on the provenance of extraterrestrial material and the dynamical pathways that deliver it to Earth. However, recovery efforts are focused on larger and slower impacts due to their higher survival probabilities and ease of detection. In this study, we investigate the prevalence of these biases in the population of recovered meteorites with known orbits. We compiled a data set of 75 meteorites with triangulated trajectories and compared their orbits to 538 potential 1 g meteorite‐dropping fireballs detected by the Global Fireball Observatory, the European Fireball Network, and the Fireball Recovery and InterPlanetary Observation Network. Our results reveal that objects with small semi‐major axis values (a1.8 au) appear 2–3 more often than expected. The current sample of meteorites with known orbits does not reflect the sources of meteorites in our collections, and it is essential to account for search and recovery biases to obtain a more representative understanding of meteorite source contributions.

Meteoritics and Planetary ScienceVol. 60(10)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Curtin University (AU), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire de Minéralogie & Cosmochimie du Muséum (FR), Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille (FR), Institut de minéralogie, de physique des matériaux et de cosmochimie (FR), Geosciences Paris-Saclay (FR), Johnson Space Center (US), International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research (AU), Romanian Academy (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Astro and Planetary Science
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.