ABM/P-15 Versus Allograft in Non-Instrumented Lumbar Fusion

There was no difference in PROMs between the ABM/P-15 and allograft group at 10-year follow-up. The incidence of reoperations in the ABM/P-15 group was lower than for the allograft group, which may be associated with cost savings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spine
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000005517
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABM/P-15 Versus Allograft in Non-Instrumented Lumbar Fusion

Andreas Andresen, Jan Sørensen, Leah Y. Carreon, Mikkel Østerheden Andersen et al.
Spine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

ABM/P-15 Versus Allograft in Non-Instrumented Lumbar Fusion

Andreas Andresen, Jan Sørensen, Leah Y. Carreon, Mikkel Østerheden Andersen, Lotte B. Nielsen
article en

Abstract

There was no difference in PROMs between the ABM/P-15 and allograft group at 10-year follow-up. The incidence of reoperations in the ABM/P-15 group was lower than for the allograft group, which may be associated with cost savings.

SpineVol. 50(23)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Lillebaelt Hospital (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.