EU Regulatory Proposal on the Treatment of Liabilities of Uncertain Existence, Timing or Amount in a Bail-In Scenario

431 The ongoing reform of the European Union’s bank crisis management framework addresses the treatment of liabilities of uncertain existence, timing or amount in a bail-in scenario, with the aim of improving clarity with respect to existing law and, consequently, increasing legal certainty. The reform process has revealed that there have been different approaches to this issue. The option that, as agreed in the trilogues, is expected to be finally approved should be viewed positively, because it gives preference to the need to pay attention to the special nature and features of liabilities of uncertain existence, timing or amount, despite the instrumental importance of their accounting treatment. However, the existence of different approaches to designing the reform has led to a regulatory proposal that is probably unnecessarily complex. In other words, the final result is positive, but it could perhaps be achieved more easily and with some technical improvement, as explained in the conclusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Company and Financial Law Review
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2025-0017
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EU Regulatory Proposal on the Treatment of Liabilities of Uncertain Existence, Timing or Amount in a Bail-In Scenario

José Luis Colino Mediavilla
European Company and Financial Law Review
European and International Law Studies
article

EU Regulatory Proposal on the Treatment of Liabilities of Uncertain Existence, Timing or Amount in a Bail-In Scenario

José Luis Colino Mediavilla
article en

Abstract

431 The ongoing reform of the European Union’s bank crisis management framework addresses the treatment of liabilities of uncertain existence, timing or amount in a bail-in scenario, with the aim of improving clarity with respect to existing law and, consequently, increasing legal certainty. The reform process has revealed that there have been different approaches to this issue. The option that, as agreed in the trilogues, is expected to be finally approved should be viewed positively, because it gives preference to the need to pay attention to the special nature and features of liabilities of uncertain existence, timing or amount, despite the instrumental importance of their accounting treatment. However, the existence of different approaches to designing the reform has led to a regulatory proposal that is probably unnecessarily complex. In other words, the final result is positive, but it could perhaps be achieved more easily and with some technical improvement, as explained in the conclusions.

European Company and Financial Law ReviewVol. 22(3)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.