Eco-Efficiency of Rural Biodigesters: Mono- and Co-Digestion of Agricultural Waste

The increasing generation of agricultural waste poses both environmental and economic challenges, particularly in rural areas with limited infrastructure. Anaerobic digestion has emerged as a sustainable alternative, enabling the valorization of waste and the production of biogas and biofertilizer. This study evaluated the economic and environmental gains of mono- and co-digestion of equine manure and vegetable waste using biodigesters of different capacities across four simulated projects—Project 1 (15 m2 biodigester with monodigestion), Project 2 (15 m2 biodigester with co-digestion), Project 3 (20 m2 biodigester with monodigestion), and Project 4 (20 m2 biodigester with co-digestion). Economic feasibility was assessed through indicators such as Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Modified IRR (MIRR), Profitability Index (PI), Benefit-Cost Ratio (B/C), Discounted Payback Period, sensitivity analysis, and Monte Carlo simulation, adopting a Minimum Attractiveness Rate (MAR) of 6.43% per year. Environmental benefits were estimated based on the annual reduction of CO2 equivalent emissions. The results showed that all projects were economically viable and had the potential to mitigate up to 36 tons of CO2eq per year. Additionally, an eco-efficiency indicator (NPV per CO2eq avoided) was calculated to enable an integrated assessment of economic performance and environmental impact. Projects using 20 m3 biodigesters achieved the best results, with Project 3 being the most eco-efficient (USD256.05/tCO2eq), while Project 4 yielded the highest absolute return in all economic analysis tools: NPV (USD 9063.81), IRR (25.10%), MIRR (10.95%), PI (USD 1.65), B/C (USD 1.65) and DPP (4.56 years). The integrated analysis underscores the significance of co-digestion and economies of scale in encouraging the adoption of this technology by small rural producers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AgriEngineering
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7090311
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eco-Efficiency of Rural Biodigesters: Mono- and Co-Digestion of Agricultural Waste

Sulma Vanessa Souza, Marcelo Figueiredo Barbosa Júnior, Régio Márcio Toesca Gimenes, Juliana Dias de Oliveira et al.
1 citations
AgriEngineering
Municipal Solid Waste Management
1.00
article

Eco-Efficiency of Rural Biodigesters: Mono- and Co-Digestion of Agricultural Waste

Sulma Vanessa Souza, Marcelo Figueiredo Barbosa Júnior, Régio Márcio Toesca Gimenes, Juliana Dias de Oliveira, Ana Carolina Amorim Orrico
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The increasing generation of agricultural waste poses both environmental and economic challenges, particularly in rural areas with limited infrastructure. Anaerobic digestion has emerged as a sustainable alternative, enabling the valorization of waste and the production of biogas and biofertilizer. This study evaluated the economic and environmental gains of mono- and co-digestion of equine manure and vegetable waste using biodigesters of different capacities across four simulated projects—Project 1 (15 m2 biodigester with monodigestion), Project 2 (15 m2 biodigester with co-digestion), Project 3 (20 m2 biodigester with monodigestion), and Project 4 (20 m2 biodigester with co-digestion). Economic feasibility was assessed through indicators such as Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Modified IRR (MIRR), Profitability Index (PI), Benefit-Cost Ratio (B/C), Discounted Payback Period, sensitivity analysis, and Monte Carlo simulation, adopting a Minimum Attractiveness Rate (MAR) of 6.43% per year. Environmental benefits were estimated based on the annual reduction of CO2 equivalent emissions. The results showed that all projects were economically viable and had the potential to mitigate up to 36 tons of CO2eq per year. Additionally, an eco-efficiency indicator (NPV per CO2eq avoided) was calculated to enable an integrated assessment of economic performance and environmental impact. Projects using 20 m3 biodigesters achieved the best results, with Project 3 being the most eco-efficient (USD256.05/tCO2eq), while Project 4 yielded the highest absolute return in all economic analysis tools: NPV (USD 9063.81), IRR (25.10%), MIRR (10.95%), PI (USD 1.65), B/C (USD 1.65) and DPP (4.56 years). The integrated analysis underscores the significance of co-digestion and economies of scale in encouraging the adoption of this technology by small rural producers.

AgriEngineeringVol. 7(9)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR), Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (BR), Uninter (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.