Development of a Testing Method for the Accuracy and Precision of GNSS and LiDAR Technology

This study evaluates the positional accuracy of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and Unmanned Aerial vehicle (UAV)-based LiDAR systems in terrain modeling, using a total station as a reference. The research was conducted over 17 Ground Control Points (GCPs), with measurements obtained using a CHCNAV i50 GNSS receiver and a DJI Zenmuse L1 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor mounted on a UAV. Accuracy was assessed for horizontal (X, Y) and vertical (Z) components by comparing the results against total station data. Errors were quantified using statistical metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and RMS at 1σ. GNSS exhibited superior horizontal accuracy with an RMS 1σ of 1.1 cm, while LiDAR achieved 1.7 cm. In contrast, GNSS outperformed LiDAR in vertical precision, achieving a 1σ RMS of 6.4 cm compared to 6.6 cm for LiDAR. These findings align with manufacturer specifications and international standards such as those of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS). The results highlight that GNSS is preferable for applications requiring high horizontal precision, while LiDAR is better suited for vertical modeling and terrain analysis. The combination of both systems may offer enhanced results for comprehensive geospatial surveys. Overall, both technologies demonstrated sub-decimetric accuracy suitable for precision agriculture, civil engineering, and environmental monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AgriEngineering
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7090310
Citations
2
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Testing Method for the Accuracy and Precision of GNSS and LiDAR Technology

Juan C. Jiménez‐Muñoz, M. A. Rojas-Quesada, Kerin F. Romero, Yorbi Castillo et al.
2 citations
AgriEngineering
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
4.69
article

Development of a Testing Method for the Accuracy and Precision of GNSS and LiDAR Technology

Juan C. Jiménez‐Muñoz, M. A. Rojas-Quesada, Kerin F. Romero, Yorbi Castillo, Yorjani Zumbado
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the positional accuracy of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and Unmanned Aerial vehicle (UAV)-based LiDAR systems in terrain modeling, using a total station as a reference. The research was conducted over 17 Ground Control Points (GCPs), with measurements obtained using a CHCNAV i50 GNSS receiver and a DJI Zenmuse L1 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor mounted on a UAV. Accuracy was assessed for horizontal (X, Y) and vertical (Z) components by comparing the results against total station data. Errors were quantified using statistical metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and RMS at 1σ. GNSS exhibited superior horizontal accuracy with an RMS 1σ of 1.1 cm, while LiDAR achieved 1.7 cm. In contrast, GNSS outperformed LiDAR in vertical precision, achieving a 1σ RMS of 6.4 cm compared to 6.6 cm for LiDAR. These findings align with manufacturer specifications and international standards such as those of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS). The results highlight that GNSS is preferable for applications requiring high horizontal precision, while LiDAR is better suited for vertical modeling and terrain analysis. The combination of both systems may offer enhanced results for comprehensive geospatial surveys. Overall, both technologies demonstrated sub-decimetric accuracy suitable for precision agriculture, civil engineering, and environmental monitoring.

AgriEngineeringVol. 7(9)
Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica (CR)
Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
4.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.