Use of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery for Right Colectomy in Rural Areas: Are the Advantages Over Open Surgery Comparable to Those Reported in Urban Centers? An Analysis Using the HCUP Michigan Inpatient Sample

BackgroundRobotic-assisted surgery is increasingly available in rural Michigan, but outcomes in these populations remain unclear. National data suggest robotic colectomies are associated with improved outcomes compared with open procedures, but evidence for rural patients is limited. This study compared postoperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic right colectomies among rural and urban Michigan residents.MethodsThe HCUP State Inpatient Sample (2016-2018) identified adults undergoing right colectomy. Rural and urban residence was classified using Urban Influence Codes (UIC); rural residence was defined as codes 3-12. Complications included prolonged ileus, pneumonia, surgical site infection, abscess, septicemia, hemorrhage/hematoma, urinary tract infection, in-hospital death, and length of stay ≥5 days. ICD-10 codes identified surgical approach. Logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs), controlling for demographic and clinical covariates.ResultsAmong rural residents, minimally invasive approaches were associated with lower odds of complications than open surgery, with robotic procedures showing the lowest odds. Urban residents undergoing robotic colectomies experienced greater reductions in odds of pneumonia and urinary tract infections than rural residents.DiscussionMinimally invasive right colectomy was associated with lower odds of complications compared with open surgery. Robotic techniques showed the most favorable outcomes, though benefits appeared greater among urban residents. These disparities may reflect institutional experience, infrastructure, or access to robotic platforms. Given the limitations of administrative data and observational design, results should be interpreted as associations rather than causation. Further studies incorporating hospital- and surgeon-level data and post-discharge outcomes are needed to clarify rural-urban differences and guide equitable surgical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251381657
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery for Right Colectomy in Rural Areas: Are the Advantages Over Open Surgery Comparable to Those Reported in Urban Centers? An Analysis Using the HCUP Michigan Inpatient Sample

Nathan M. Novotny, Ryan T. Davis, Jacob Applegarth, Beth A. Bailey et al.
The American Surgeon
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Use of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery for Right Colectomy in Rural Areas: Are the Advantages Over Open Surgery Comparable to Those Reported in Urban Centers? An Analysis Using the HCUP Michigan Inpatient Sample

Nathan M. Novotny, Ryan T. Davis, Jacob Applegarth, Beth A. Bailey, Ibrahim B. Baida
article en

Abstract

BackgroundRobotic-assisted surgery is increasingly available in rural Michigan, but outcomes in these populations remain unclear. National data suggest robotic colectomies are associated with improved outcomes compared with open procedures, but evidence for rural patients is limited. This study compared postoperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic right colectomies among rural and urban Michigan residents.MethodsThe HCUP State Inpatient Sample (2016-2018) identified adults undergoing right colectomy. Rural and urban residence was classified using Urban Influence Codes (UIC); rural residence was defined as codes 3-12. Complications included prolonged ileus, pneumonia, surgical site infection, abscess, septicemia, hemorrhage/hematoma, urinary tract infection, in-hospital death, and length of stay ≥5 days. ICD-10 codes identified surgical approach. Logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs), controlling for demographic and clinical covariates.ResultsAmong rural residents, minimally invasive approaches were associated with lower odds of complications than open surgery, with robotic procedures showing the lowest odds. Urban residents undergoing robotic colectomies experienced greater reductions in odds of pneumonia and urinary tract infections than rural residents.DiscussionMinimally invasive right colectomy was associated with lower odds of complications compared with open surgery. Robotic techniques showed the most favorable outcomes, though benefits appeared greater among urban residents. These disparities may reflect institutional experience, infrastructure, or access to robotic platforms. Given the limitations of administrative data and observational design, results should be interpreted as associations rather than causation. Further studies incorporating hospital- and surgeon-level data and post-discharge outcomes are needed to clarify rural-urban differences and guide equitable surgical care.

The American SurgeonVol. 92(3)
Central Michigan University (US), Beaumont Hospital, Troy (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.