Robot Kingdom: On the Difficulty of Finding the Definition of Robots

What is a robot? In this paper, we discuss some problems for finding one, universally applicable definition of robots. Robots are technological artefacts, and new types of robots are regularly being invented and engineered. Robots are also a common topic in fiction, which continuously affects the way robots are conceived. Moreover, the perception of what counts as a robot in public discourse differs from the standard definitions of robots that can be found in academic literature. Considering that finding one adequate definition of robots seems to be impossible and the fact that robots are gaining social significance leading to a growing need to discuss them among different stakeholders and audiences, we propose to shift the way in which robots are discussed. We propose an analogy to animals: just like we can talk about the animal kingdom, we can talk about the robot kingdom, which allows for different varieties of entities that belong to this category without assuming that they all share certain necessary and sufficient properties. This allows us to focus on different representatives of the robot kingdom depending on the context of discussion instead of defining the concept of “robot” and focusing on the important characteristics of robots, which may vary for each given context. The adoption of the robot kingdom approach would facilitate and support a better interdisciplinary understanding and communication across the board fields of robot research. This would enable and promote the traveling of evidence and new research results between fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Robotics
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-025-01322-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robot Kingdom: On the Difficulty of Finding the Definition of Robots

Pekka Mäkelä, Tomi Kokkonen, Raul Hakli, Kamil Mamak
1 citations
International Journal of Social Robotics
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
1.50
article

Robot Kingdom: On the Difficulty of Finding the Definition of Robots

Pekka Mäkelä, Tomi Kokkonen, Raul Hakli, Kamil Mamak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

What is a robot? In this paper, we discuss some problems for finding one, universally applicable definition of robots. Robots are technological artefacts, and new types of robots are regularly being invented and engineered. Robots are also a common topic in fiction, which continuously affects the way robots are conceived. Moreover, the perception of what counts as a robot in public discourse differs from the standard definitions of robots that can be found in academic literature. Considering that finding one adequate definition of robots seems to be impossible and the fact that robots are gaining social significance leading to a growing need to discuss them among different stakeholders and audiences, we propose to shift the way in which robots are discussed. We propose an analogy to animals: just like we can talk about the animal kingdom, we can talk about the robot kingdom, which allows for different varieties of entities that belong to this category without assuming that they all share certain necessary and sufficient properties. This allows us to focus on different representatives of the robot kingdom depending on the context of discussion instead of defining the concept of “robot” and focusing on the important characteristics of robots, which may vary for each given context. The adoption of the robot kingdom approach would facilitate and support a better interdisciplinary understanding and communication across the board fields of robot research. This would enable and promote the traveling of evidence and new research results between fields.

International Journal of Social RoboticsVol. 17(11)
Jagiellonian University (PL), University of Helsinki (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.