Christian Origins of Modern Political Anthropology: Alexandre Kojève’s Position on Leo Strauss’s Problem

The paper presents an attempt to solve the problem of Leo Strauss’s statements about the role of Christianity and the category of individuality in la querelle des Anciens et des Modernes by looking at it from Alexandre Kojève’s point of view. His interpretation, which was developed in a close cooperation with Strauss, allows us to gain a better understanding of the relationship between Christianity and the anthropology of the moderns. According to Kojève’s reconstruction of the history of philosophy, Christian understanding of humanity establishes the indivisible unity of the three fundamental anthropological categories – individuality, historicity and freedom. It marks a rejection of the ancient idea of law and provides the anthropological framework for the development of modern political theory. Kojève’s interpretation shows that the two different meanings of Strauss’s statement about the category of individuality are in fact inseparable – thinking in terms of unique and unrepeatable events emerges with Christianity, and moral individualism, the belief in the absolute value of each individual human being, is also of Christian origin.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Teoria Polityki
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4467/25440845tp.25.009.21646
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Christian Origins of Modern Political Anthropology: Alexandre Kojève’s Position on Leo Strauss’s Problem

Linas Jokubaitis
Teoria Polityki
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

Christian Origins of Modern Political Anthropology: Alexandre Kojève’s Position on Leo Strauss’s Problem

Linas Jokubaitis
article en

Abstract

The paper presents an attempt to solve the problem of Leo Strauss’s statements about the role of Christianity and the category of individuality in la querelle des Anciens et des Modernes by looking at it from Alexandre Kojève’s point of view. His interpretation, which was developed in a close cooperation with Strauss, allows us to gain a better understanding of the relationship between Christianity and the anthropology of the moderns. According to Kojève’s reconstruction of the history of philosophy, Christian understanding of humanity establishes the indivisible unity of the three fundamental anthropological categories – individuality, historicity and freedom. It marks a rejection of the ancient idea of law and provides the anthropological framework for the development of modern political theory. Kojève’s interpretation shows that the two different meanings of Strauss’s statement about the category of individuality are in fact inseparable – thinking in terms of unique and unrepeatable events emerges with Christianity, and moral individualism, the belief in the absolute value of each individual human being, is also of Christian origin.

Teoria PolitykiVol. 11
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.