Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness
<b>Background/Objective:</b> Identifying fluid-responsive patients is essential in managing hemodynamic instability. Traditional static measures like central venous pressure (CVP) are often unreliable. Prior studies suggest that cardiac ultrasound (US), particularly carotid Doppler point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), may correlate with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-derived cardiac output (CO), offering a noninvasive tool to assess fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between carotid ultrasound (US) parameters and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) derived measurements in post cardiac surgery patients. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a prospective cohort study on 50 postcardiac surgery patients from 2019 to 2022 in a single cardiothoracic ICU. Carotid US and PAC CO measurements were obtained at four intervals: pre- and post-passive leg raise (fluid challenge) on ICU admission, and one hour later. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in carotid blood flow, ≥7 ms increase in corrected flow time (FTc), or ≥10% change in respiratory peak carotid systolic velocity (ΔCDPV). Pearson's correlation and linear regression were used to assess associations between carotid US and PAC changes. Agreement in fluid responsiveness categorization (≥10% CO change) was evaluated using weighted Cohen's kappa. Significance was set at α = 0.05. <b>Results:</b> No significant correlation was found between changes in carotid US parameters and the PAC cardiac index (CI) at baseline or one hour for ΔCDPV, FTc, or carotid blood flow. A moderate correlation was observed between carotid blood flow and FTc at one hour (r = 0.41, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Regression and sensitivity analyses showed no significant associations. <b>Conclusions:</b> The carotid US parameters did not correlate with PAC-derived CO after passive leg raise. Further studies are needed to validate carotid POCUS in this setting.
Authors
- Samir Sethi
- Brady Rippon
- James Osorio
- Joydeep Baidya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1396-1786)
- Mario Gaudino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4680-0815)
- Christopher W. Tam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6183-5971)
- Alexandra J. Lopes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5527-1578)
- Kane O. Pryor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9212-5526)
- Shantanu Rastogi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8066-942X)
- Ankur Srivastava (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0882-4691)
- Avika Kasubhai
Institutions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Montefiore Medical Center (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Morristown Medical Center (US)
- Presbyterian Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Published
- 2025-09-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186657
- Primary Topic
- Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00