Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness

<b>Background/Objective:</b> Identifying fluid-responsive patients is essential in managing hemodynamic instability. Traditional static measures like central venous pressure (CVP) are often unreliable. Prior studies suggest that cardiac ultrasound (US), particularly carotid Doppler point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), may correlate with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-derived cardiac output (CO), offering a noninvasive tool to assess fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between carotid ultrasound (US) parameters and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) derived measurements in post cardiac surgery patients. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a prospective cohort study on 50 postcardiac surgery patients from 2019 to 2022 in a single cardiothoracic ICU. Carotid US and PAC CO measurements were obtained at four intervals: pre- and post-passive leg raise (fluid challenge) on ICU admission, and one hour later. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in carotid blood flow, ≥7 ms increase in corrected flow time (FTc), or ≥10% change in respiratory peak carotid systolic velocity (ΔCDPV). Pearson's correlation and linear regression were used to assess associations between carotid US and PAC changes. Agreement in fluid responsiveness categorization (≥10% CO change) was evaluated using weighted Cohen's kappa. Significance was set at α = 0.05. <b>Results:</b> No significant correlation was found between changes in carotid US parameters and the PAC cardiac index (CI) at baseline or one hour for ΔCDPV, FTc, or carotid blood flow. A moderate correlation was observed between carotid blood flow and FTc at one hour (r = 0.41, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Regression and sensitivity analyses showed no significant associations. <b>Conclusions:</b> The carotid US parameters did not correlate with PAC-derived CO after passive leg raise. Further studies are needed to validate carotid POCUS in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186657
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness

Samir Sethi, Brady Rippon, James Osorio, Joydeep Baidya et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness

Samir Sethi, Brady Rippon, James Osorio, Joydeep Baidya, Mario Gaudino, Christopher W. Tam, Alexandra J. Lopes, Kane O. Pryor, Shantanu Rastogi, Ankur Srivastava, Avika Kasubhai
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objective:</b> Identifying fluid-responsive patients is essential in managing hemodynamic instability. Traditional static measures like central venous pressure (CVP) are often unreliable. Prior studies suggest that cardiac ultrasound (US), particularly carotid Doppler point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), may correlate with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-derived cardiac output (CO), offering a noninvasive tool to assess fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between carotid ultrasound (US) parameters and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) derived measurements in post cardiac surgery patients. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a prospective cohort study on 50 postcardiac surgery patients from 2019 to 2022 in a single cardiothoracic ICU. Carotid US and PAC CO measurements were obtained at four intervals: pre- and post-passive leg raise (fluid challenge) on ICU admission, and one hour later. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in carotid blood flow, ≥7 ms increase in corrected flow time (FTc), or ≥10% change in respiratory peak carotid systolic velocity (ΔCDPV). Pearson's correlation and linear regression were used to assess associations between carotid US and PAC changes. Agreement in fluid responsiveness categorization (≥10% CO change) was evaluated using weighted Cohen's kappa. Significance was set at α = 0.05. <b>Results:</b> No significant correlation was found between changes in carotid US parameters and the PAC cardiac index (CI) at baseline or one hour for ΔCDPV, FTc, or carotid blood flow. A moderate correlation was observed between carotid blood flow and FTc at one hour (r = 0.41, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Regression and sensitivity analyses showed no significant associations. <b>Conclusions:</b> The carotid US parameters did not correlate with PAC-derived CO after passive leg raise. Further studies are needed to validate carotid POCUS in this setting.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(18)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US), Georgetown University (US), Cornell University (US), Morristown Medical Center (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.