Framing Surgical Decisions in Elderly Patients: Minimally Invasive Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma at Mid-Term Follow-Up

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The optimal surgical approach for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in ultra-octogenarians remains debated, especially when balancing oncologic control, renal preservation, and procedural safety. While ablative techniques and active surveillance are often favored in frail patients, robust comparative evidence supporting nephron-sparing surgery in this age group is limited. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients aged ≥80 years who underwent minimally invasive surgery for cT1 clear cell RCC at a high-volume tertiary-care center between July 2001 and August 2025. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN, <i>n</i> = 51) and radical nephrectomy (MIRN, n = 26). All MIPNs were performed using an off-clamp approach. Baseline, perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes were compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression to significant chronic kidney disease (sCKD, defined as CKD stage ≥ 3b). <b>Results</b>: Groups were comparable in age, comorbidities, and ASA score. MIRN patients exhibited higher tumor complexity (RENAL score: 9 vs. 7, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and a greater proportion of pT1b lesions (77% vs. 37.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Perioperative transfusions occurred exclusively in the MIRN group (<i>p</i> = 0.01), whereas complication rates were low and similar between groups. MIPN was associated with significantly higher eGFR at follow-up (48 vs. 30.9 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and a delayed progression to sCKD (<i>p</i> = 0.01), with no differences in OS or CSS at a median follow-up of 30.5 months. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this real-world series of ultra-octogenarians with cT1 clear cell RCC, off-clamp minimally invasive partial nephrectomy ensured superior renal function preservation and delayed progression to sCKD, without compromising oncologic control at mid-term follow-up. Beyond statistical outcomes, these results underscore the importance of tailoring surgical strategies to protect long-term functional autonomy and preserve physiological resilience in elderly patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186634
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing Surgical Decisions in Elderly Patients: Minimally Invasive Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma at Mid-Term Follow-Up

Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, Gabriele Tuderti, Aldo Brassetti, Rocco Simone Flammia et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Framing Surgical Decisions in Elderly Patients: Minimally Invasive Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma at Mid-Term Follow-Up

Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, Gabriele Tuderti, Aldo Brassetti, Rocco Simone Flammia, Silvia Cartolano, Leslie Claire Licari, Eugenio Bologna, Riccardo Mastroianni, Umberto Anceschi, Alfredo Maria Bove, Antonella Tufano, Giuseppe Simone, Mauro Iori, Simone D’Annunzio, Costantino Leonardo, Marco Pula
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The optimal surgical approach for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in ultra-octogenarians remains debated, especially when balancing oncologic control, renal preservation, and procedural safety. While ablative techniques and active surveillance are often favored in frail patients, robust comparative evidence supporting nephron-sparing surgery in this age group is limited. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients aged ≥80 years who underwent minimally invasive surgery for cT1 clear cell RCC at a high-volume tertiary-care center between July 2001 and August 2025. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN, <i>n</i> = 51) and radical nephrectomy (MIRN, n = 26). All MIPNs were performed using an off-clamp approach. Baseline, perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes were compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression to significant chronic kidney disease (sCKD, defined as CKD stage ≥ 3b). <b>Results</b>: Groups were comparable in age, comorbidities, and ASA score. MIRN patients exhibited higher tumor complexity (RENAL score: 9 vs. 7, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and a greater proportion of pT1b lesions (77% vs. 37.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Perioperative transfusions occurred exclusively in the MIRN group (<i>p</i> = 0.01), whereas complication rates were low and similar between groups. MIPN was associated with significantly higher eGFR at follow-up (48 vs. 30.9 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and a delayed progression to sCKD (<i>p</i> = 0.01), with no differences in OS or CSS at a median follow-up of 30.5 months. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this real-world series of ultra-octogenarians with cT1 clear cell RCC, off-clamp minimally invasive partial nephrectomy ensured superior renal function preservation and delayed progression to sCKD, without compromising oncologic control at mid-term follow-up. Beyond statistical outcomes, these results underscore the importance of tailoring surgical strategies to protect long-term functional autonomy and preserve physiological resilience in elderly patients.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(18)
Ospedale San Carlo (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.