Nature Against Nature

Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Nature, published in 1836, became one of the founding documents of American environmentalism, its veneration of the natural world a reformulation of the intimidating wilderness previously haunting the minds of those in the young nation. His work, however, framed nature as serving human ends; a response to a specific time and place, nineteenth-century New England, Nature either ignored or diminished the lives of the nonhuman animals who inhabited those spaces. The influence of Emerson’s framing on the environmental movement would contribute to its concern for animals at a species rather than individual level, creating a divide between environmental and animal activists in the generations that followed, one that is still present in the movements today. Using a critical animal studies lens, this article examines the role of animals in Emerson’s Nature to help explain the nineteenth-century causes of that divide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecokritike
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33823/eke.2025.2.2.399
Primary Topic
Historical and Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nature Against Nature

Thomas Aiello
Ecokritike
Historical and Literary Studies
article

Nature Against Nature

Thomas Aiello
article en

Abstract

Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Nature, published in 1836, became one of the founding documents of American environmentalism, its veneration of the natural world a reformulation of the intimidating wilderness previously haunting the minds of those in the young nation. His work, however, framed nature as serving human ends; a response to a specific time and place, nineteenth-century New England, Nature either ignored or diminished the lives of the nonhuman animals who inhabited those spaces. The influence of Emerson’s framing on the environmental movement would contribute to its concern for animals at a species rather than individual level, creating a divide between environmental and animal activists in the generations that followed, one that is still present in the movements today. Using a critical animal studies lens, this article examines the role of animals in Emerson’s Nature to help explain the nineteenth-century causes of that divide.

EcokritikeVol. 2(2)
Valdosta State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Historical and Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.