Accuracy of a bat-mounted sensor for the measurement of bat speed among elite female cricket players

Currently, there are no validated field-based measures of bat speed in cricket. This study sought to validate a baseball bat-mounted sensor for use in cricketers. Nine professional female cricketers (19.9 ± 2.8 years, 166.6 ± 4.8 cm, 68.7 ± 8.6 kg) performed 40 swings across four shot types (Cut, Drive, Pull, Slog-Sweep). Bat speed from a bat-mounted sensor was compared to optical motion capture (MoCap). Bat speed differed between shot types and ranged from 52.8 to 87.9 km/h. Device accuracy was determined by Bland-Altman bias and precision. The Drive shot had the smallest bias (-1.0 km/h; 1.4%), followed by the Slog-Sweep (2.0 km/h; 2.7%), Pull (2.0 km/h; 2.8%) then Cut shot, (2.5 km/h; 3.9%). The Cut shot had the greatest precision (2.7 km/h; 4.1%), followed by Pull (3.4 km/h; 4.7%), Slog-Sweep (4.0 km/h; 5.3%) and Drive (4.4 km/h; 6.3%). Kendall's tau analysis showed that proportional errors increased with higher bat speeds for all shots except Pull, (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The evidence supports use of the sensor for bat speed among female cricket players for all shots between speeds of 52.8-87.9 km/h. Caution is warranted for additional shot types, and speeds outside the explored range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports Biomechanics
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2025.2549136
Primary Topic
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of a bat-mounted sensor for the measurement of bat speed among elite female cricket players

Peter J. Sinclair, Samuel Chalmers, Jonathan Freeston, Jordan Andersen et al.
Sports Biomechanics
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
article

Accuracy of a bat-mounted sensor for the measurement of bat speed among elite female cricket players

Peter J. Sinclair, Samuel Chalmers, Jonathan Freeston, Jordan Andersen, Sean G.J. Hardy, Matthew Hollings, E. Ho
article en

Abstract

Currently, there are no validated field-based measures of bat speed in cricket. This study sought to validate a baseball bat-mounted sensor for use in cricketers. Nine professional female cricketers (19.9 ± 2.8 years, 166.6 ± 4.8 cm, 68.7 ± 8.6 kg) performed 40 swings across four shot types (Cut, Drive, Pull, Slog-Sweep). Bat speed from a bat-mounted sensor was compared to optical motion capture (MoCap). Bat speed differed between shot types and ranged from 52.8 to 87.9 km/h. Device accuracy was determined by Bland-Altman bias and precision. The Drive shot had the smallest bias (-1.0 km/h; 1.4%), followed by the Slog-Sweep (2.0 km/h; 2.7%), Pull (2.0 km/h; 2.8%) then Cut shot, (2.5 km/h; 3.9%). The Cut shot had the greatest precision (2.7 km/h; 4.1%), followed by Pull (3.4 km/h; 4.7%), Slog-Sweep (4.0 km/h; 5.3%) and Drive (4.4 km/h; 6.3%). Kendall's tau analysis showed that proportional errors increased with higher bat speeds for all shots except Pull, (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The evidence supports use of the sensor for bat speed among female cricket players for all shots between speeds of 52.8-87.9 km/h. Caution is warranted for additional shot types, and speeds outside the explored range.

Sports Biomechanics
The University of Sydney (AU), University of South Australia (AU), Major League Baseball (US), Low Carbon Living CRC (Australia) (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.